§Why CasetextPricing

Bonnevier v. Amoena USA Corporation

REPLY

8 Cited authorities

  1. Pfeil v. Rogers

    757 F.2d 850 (7th Cir. 1985)   Cited 367 times
    Holding that an affidavit failing to satisfy the "technical, non-substantive requirements of execution" may be considered as part of a party's opposition to a motion for summary judgment provided the affidavit complies with 28 U.S.C. § 1746

  2. DeBruyne v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.

    920 F.2d 457 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff's evidence that an investment lost money, coupled with an expert's opinion that a typical funds manager would not have acted as the fiduciary had acted, was not sufficient to rebut the fiduciary's assertion at summary judgment that its investment strategies were prudent

  3. Trapaga v. Central States Joint Board Local 10

    No. 05 C 5742 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 30, 2007)   Cited 17 times
    Concluding that certain declarations were sufficiently verified when they contained language suggests that the declarants knew that they were required to tell the truth and that there would be adverse legal consequences for not doing so, but striking other declarations that lacked such language and only indicated that they were sworn under Section 1109

  4. United States ex rel. Grant v. Martin

    (N.D. Ill. Aug. 21, 2013)

    08-21-2013 United States of America ex rel. Roosevelt Grant, Petitioner, v. Allan Martin, Warden, Shawnee Correctional Center, Respondent. Thomas M. Durkin Judge Thomas M. Durkin MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner Roosevelt Grant, a state prisoner serving concurrent prison terms for armed robbery, possession of a stolen vehicle, and aggravated battery, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. R. 1. Respondent Warden Allan Martin answered the petition, arguing that the petition

  5. Knights v. Williams

    No. 02 C 5017 (N.D. Ill. Jul. 28, 2005)   Cited 3 times
    In Knights, the declarant had signed the block that signified he had attested to the facts, but had not signed the block confirming that the attestation was under penalty of perjury.

  6. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 28,511 times   185 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

  7. Section 1406 - Cure or waiver of defects

    28 U.S.C. § 1406   Cited 14,247 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that transfer is proper to any district or division in which the action could have been brought

  8. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,095 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead