47 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,896 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,933 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. District of Columbia et al. v. Heller

    554 U.S. 570 (2008)   Cited 4,070 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is "not a new proposition" that a plaintiff had standing to challenge the denial of a gun licensing permit
  4. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,711 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a facial challenger "must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid"
  5. U.S. v. Stevens

    559 U.S. 460 (2010)   Cited 1,225 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding law unconstitutional under First Amendment where "impermissible applications ... far outnumber[ed] any permissible ones"
  6. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.

    467 U.S. 986 (1984)   Cited 1,097 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trade secret property right was protected under the Takings Clause
  7. Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy

    367 U.S. 886 (1961)   Cited 1,792 times
    Holding that where plaintiff "remained entirely free to obtain employment" either with her employer or another employer, her liberty right in "follow[ing] a chosen trade or profession" was not implicated
  8. City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.

    535 U.S. 425 (2002)   Cited 416 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "'[t]he First Amendment does not require a city, before enacting . . . an [adult entertainment secondary effects] ordinance to conduct new studies or produce evidence independent of that already generated by other cities, so long as whatever evidence the city relies upon is reasonably believed to be relevant to the problem that the city addresses.'"
  9. Clark v. Jeter

    486 U.S. 456 (1988)   Cited 586 times
    Holding that "classifications that burden illegitimate children for the sake of punishing the illicit relations of their parents" must be "substantially related to an important governmental objective"
  10. Schall v. Martin

    467 U.S. 253 (1984)   Cited 657 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that protecting the community from crime is a compelling interest
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,619 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 922 - Unlawful acts

    18 U.S.C. § 922   Cited 63,378 times   187 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "even before the sale of a firearm, the gun, its component parts, ammunition, and the raw materials from which they are made have considerably moved in interstate commerce"
  13. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 11,248 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing for automatic substitution of public officer's successor for official-capacity claims
  14. Section 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities

    18 U.S.C. § 930   Cited 124 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that for purposes of § 930, a dangerous weapon "means a weapon, device, [or] instrument . . . that is used for, or is readily capable of, causing death or serious bodily injury, except that such term does not include a pocket knife with a blade of less than 2 ½ inches in length"
  15. Section 3061 - Investigative powers of Postal Service personnel

    18 U.S.C. § 3061   Cited 51 times
    Granting investigative and other law enforcement powers to "Postal Inspectors and other agents of the United States Postal Service designated by the Board of Governors to investigate criminal matters related to the Postal Service and the mails"
  16. Section 18-12-201 - Legislative declaration

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-201   Cited 5 times

    (1) The general assembly finds that: (a) There exists a widespread inconsistency among jurisdictions within the state with regard to the issuance of permits to carry concealed handguns; (b) (Deleted by amendment, L. 2021.) (c) Inconsistency regarding issuance of permits results in the arbitrary and capricious denial of permits to carry concealed handguns based on the jurisdiction of residence rather than the qualifications for obtaining a permit; (d) Officials of local governments are uniquely equipped

  17. Section 232.1 - Conduct on postal property

    39 C.F.R. § 232.1   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the sale or use of any controlled substance on postal premises
  18. Section 504.14 - Weapons and explosives

    36 C.F.R. § 504.14

    No person while on the premises shall carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, except for official purposes. 36 C.F.R. § 504.14

  19. Section 702.7 - Weapons and explosives

    36 C.F.R. § 702.7

    Except where duly authorized by law, and in the performance of law enforcement functions, no person shall carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, while on the premises. 36 C.F.R. § 702.7

  20. Section 407.13 - Weapons and explosives

    31 C.F.R. § 407.13

    No person while on the property shall carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, except for official purposes. 31 C.F.R. § 407.13