22 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,816 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,381 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  3. Jones v. Bock

    549 U.S. 199 (2007)   Cited 12,923 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that PLRA exhaustion is mandatory, and prisoners cannot bring unexhausted claims into federal court
  4. Porter v. Nussle

    534 U.S. 516 (2002)   Cited 13,924 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state prisoner must exhaust administrative remedies before filing a complaint
  5. Booth v. Churner

    532 U.S. 731 (2001)   Cited 11,131 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prisoner had to exhaust available administrative procedures even though they could not result in the relief he sought, namely damages
  6. Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida

    517 U.S. 44 (1996)   Cited 5,097 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress cannot abrogate state-sovereign immunity under its Article I commerce power, and rejecting the result in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. , 491 U.S. 1, 109 S.Ct. 2273, 105 L.Ed.2d 1, seven years later; the decision in Union Gas never garnered a majority
  7. Edelman v. Jordan

    415 U.S. 651 (1974)   Cited 8,144 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that waiver may be found in "express language" or by "overwhelming implications from the text"
  8. McCarthy v. Madigan

    503 U.S. 140 (1992)   Cited 1,837 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prisoner was not required to exhaust the Bureau of Prisons' administrative procedure before making a Bivens claim for money damages
  9. Oracle Corp. Sec. Lit. v. Oracle Corp.

    627 F.3d 376 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 2,482 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an earnings miss, standing alone, is insufficient to establish loss causation; the market must have learned of and reacted to the company's fraudulent practices as opposed to the financial impact of those practices
  10. Brown v. Valoff

    422 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 2,136 times
    Holding that statute of limitations is tolled while prisoner completes mandatory exhaustion process
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 489,268 times   693 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,613 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  13. Section 1997e - Suits by prisoners

    42 U.S.C. § 1997e   Cited 53,997 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prisoners must exhaust "available" administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court
  14. Section 30.265 - Scope of liability of public body, officers, employees and agents; liability in nuclear incident

    ORS § 30.265   Cited 531 times
    Requiring the substitution of the State of Oregon as defendant for torts allegedly committed by a state employee acting within the scope of employment
  15. Section 291-109-0100 - Authority, Purpose, and Policy

    Or. Admin. R. 291-109-0100   Cited 45 times

    (1) Authority: The authority for these rules is granted to the Director of the Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS 179.040, 423.020, 423.030, and 423.075. (2) Purpose: The purpose of these rules is to establish department policy and procedures for adult in custody (AIC) communication with staff and the administration of the department's internal grievance review and appeal system for AICs confined in Department of Corrections facilities. (3) Policy: (a) It is the policy of the Department

  16. Section 291-109-0150 - [Repealed]

    Or. Admin. R. 291-109-0150   Cited 39 times
    Providing that "the functional unit grievance coordinator must receive an inmate's grievance within 30 calendar days of the date of the incident giving rise to the grievance"