§Why CasetextPricing

Boesky vs. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC

REPLY

55 Cited authorities

  1. Nken v. Holder

    556 U.S. 418 (2009)   Cited 3,289 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"

  2. Bailey v. United States

    516 U.S. 137 (1995)   Cited 2,762 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Government must show active employment of firearm to support § 924(c) conviction

  3. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,390 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  4. Leocal v. Ashcroft

    543 U.S. 1 (2004)   Cited 1,153 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "DUI causing serious bodily injury" is not a "crime of violence"

  5. Cort v. Ash

    422 U.S. 66 (1975)   Cited 3,045 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding no private action under criminal statutes absent clear statutory basis for such inference

  6. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.

    564 U.S. 552 (2011)   Cited 506 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on "speech result[ing] from an economic motive" is not "a mere commercial regulation"

  7. U.S. v. O'Brien

    560 U.S. 218 (2010)   Cited 394 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the status of a firearm as a machine gun is an element, rather than a sentencing factor when used to support an enhanced sentence, but upholding a guilty plea by the defendants to a violation of § 924(c) that listed three different firearms

  8. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n

    485 U.S. 439 (1988)   Cited 788 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an adherent was not entitled to challenge a third party's actions that offended his beliefs

  9. Samantar v. Yousuf et al.

    560 U.S. 305 (2010)   Cited 378 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the common law, rather than the FSIA, governs the immunity of foreign officials

  10. Thompson v. Thompson

    484 U.S. 174 (1988)   Cited 615 times
    Holding that the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act did not create a private cause of action enforceable in federal court because doing so would "entangle [federal courts] in traditional state-law questions that they have little expertise to resolve"

  11. Section 551 - Protection of subscriber privacy

    47 U.S.C. § 551   Cited 1,492 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting disclosure of "personally identifiable information" concerning cable subscriber without consent

  12. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,323 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"

  13. Section 2721 - Prohibition on release and use of certain personal information from State motor vehicle records

    18 U.S.C. § 2721   Cited 610 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Exempting any government agency, including law enforcement, "in carrying out its functions"

  14. Section 3731 - False claims procedure

    31 U.S.C. § 3731   Cited 582 times   63 Legal Analyses
    In § 3731(a), Congress apparently used the phrase "under section 3730" to mean all three § 3730 actions. § 3731(a) (a "subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a trial or hearing conducted under section 3730 of this title may be served at any place in the United States").

  15. Section 2707 - Civil action

    18 U.S.C. § 2707   Cited 457 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief to those "aggrieved by any violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind"

  16. Section 2702 - Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2702   Cited 344 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Restricting use of Internet subscriber information without consent

  17. Section 735 ILCS 5/13-206 - Ten year limitation

    735 ILCS 5/13-206   Cited 323 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing in relevant part that "actions on ... written contracts ... shall be commenced within 10 years next after the cause of action accrued"

  18. Section 2724 - Civil action

    18 U.S.C. § 2724   Cited 287 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Outlining remedies available under the DPPA

  19. Section 2710 - Wrongful disclosure of video tape rental or sale records

    18 U.S.C. § 2710   Cited 207 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting disclosure of "personally identifiable information concerning" consumer of video rental establishment without consent

  20. Section 5739.16 - Four-year limitation for assessments - exceptions

    Ohio Rev. Code § 5739.16   Cited 13 times

    (A) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no assessment shall be made or issued against a vendor or consumer for any tax imposed by or pursuant to section 5739.02, 5739.021, 5739.023, 5739.026, or 5739.10 of the Revised Code more than four years after the return date for the period in which the sale or purchase was made, or more than four years after the return for such period is filed, whichever is later. A consumer who provides a fully completed exemption certificate pursuant to division

  21. Section 130.815 - Preservation and Retention of Records

    Ill. Admin. Code tit. 86 § 130.815

    a) Books and records and other papers reflecting gross receipts received during any period with respect to which the Department is authorized to issue notices of tax liability as provided by Sections 4 and 5 of the Act shall be preserved until the expiration of such period unless the Department, in writing, shall authorize their destruction or disposal prior to such expiration. b) In determining the period for which the Department is authorized to issue a notice of tax liability, the following material