29 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,377 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,313 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Acumed LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.

    561 F.3d 199 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 444 times
    Holding that "the absence of privilege or justification on the part of the defendant" is a requisite element of the tort of tortious interference with business relationships
  4. General Refractories v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

    337 F.3d 297 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 321 times
    Holding that a civil conspiracy claim requires a valid underlying tort claim
  5. Boring v. Google Inc.

    362 F. App'x 273 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 95 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff did not state an unjust enrichment claim upon which relief could be granted where benefit was allegedly taken from plaintiff without permission
  6. City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

    277 F.3d 415 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 104 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the City had no standing to bring claims against gun manufacturers for costs allegedly associated with the criminal use of handguns because, among other reasons, the claims were "entirely derivative of those of others who would be more appropriate plaintiffs"
  7. Hart v. O'Malley

    436 Pa. Super. 151 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994)   Cited 108 times
    Referring to "collateral purpose" as "use primarily for a purpose for which the process was not designed"
  8. USX Corp. v. Adriatic Insurance

    99 F. Supp. 2d 593 (W.D. Pa. 2000)   Cited 66 times
    Finding that, when viewed in context with the other enumerated offenses in the definition of "personal injury," the meaning of "discrimination" is limited to differential treatment of a person based upon immutable characteristics such as race, sex, age, religion, or national origin
  9. Granite State Ins. Co. v. Aamco Transmissions

    57 F.3d 316 (3d Cir. 1995)   Cited 63 times
    Stating that Lanham Act is derived from common law tort of unfair competition and its language parallels the protections afforded by state common law
  10. Orthovita, Inc. v. Erbe

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-2395 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 14, 2008)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that claims for breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty were not barred because complaint alleges "generalized harm" from "acts and omissions" that go beyond contractual claims and former employee's "fiduciary duties extend beyond the limits of an employment contract due to the parties' relative positions"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,529 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss