§Why CasetextPricing

Bleier v. Bundesrepublik Deutscheland et al

MOTION

20 Cited authorities

  1. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A.

    544 U.S. 528 (2005)   Cited 1,157 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a substantive due process inquiry has "no proper place" in Takings doctrine, while distinguishing Nollan and Dolan as a special application of unconstitutional conditions doctrine for Takings

  2. Dolan v. City of Tigard

    512 U.S. 374 (1994)   Cited 800 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compelled dedication of an easement for public use would constitute a taking

  3. Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n

    483 U.S. 825 (1987)   Cited 925 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for a development exaction to be constitutional, there must be an "essential nexus" between the valid state interest and the permit condition

  4. Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

    524 U.S. 498 (1998)   Cited 557 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that levying Coal Act premiums on a pre-1978 signatory operator was an unconstitutional taking because the operator never agreed to provide lifetime benefits to its retirees

  5. Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.

    504 U.S. 607 (1992)   Cited 648 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Argentina's issuance of bonds constitutes a commercial activity within the meaning of the FSIA

  6. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California

    509 U.S. 764 (1993)   Cited 569 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegation that defendant insurers and reinsurers told "groups of insurance brokers and agents . . . that a reinsurance boycott, and thus loss of income to the agents and brokers who would be unable to find available markets for their customers, would ensue" if the terms desired by defendants in commercial general liability insurance were not approved, was a boycott under the McCarran-Ferguson Act

  7. Fujitsu Ltd. v. Federal Exp. Corp.

    247 F.3d 423 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 982 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conclusory allegations cannot defeat summary judgment

  8. Reid v. Covert

    354 U.S. 1 (1956)   Cited 483 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the United States Government must abide by the Constitution when it prosecutes civilian dependents accompanying members of the armed forces overseas

  9. Lynch v. United States

    292 U.S. 571 (1934)   Cited 676 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government could not avoid payment of its commitment to pay disability and life insurance by enacting a statute repealing the laws granting the benefit without committing a constitutional taking

  10. Hilton v. Guyot

    159 U.S. 113 (1895)   Cited 1,098 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that matters should not be retried absent a showing of prejudice, fraud, or some other extenuating circumstance "where there has been opportunity for a full and fair trial abroad before a court of competent jurisdiction"

  11. Section 1605 - General exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state

    28 U.S.C. § 1605   Cited 1,896 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the meaning given that term in section 3 of the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991

  12. Section 1330 - Actions against foreign states

    28 U.S.C. § 1330   Cited 1,645 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts with jurisdiction over claims against "foreign state"