Goodman v. Staples the Office Super-Store, LLC
644 F.3d 817 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 526 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that treating physicians were retained experts where they formed their opinions after treatment for purposes of litigation, and their opinions were outside the scope of the treatment they rendered
Wong v. Regents of University of California
410 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 644 timesHolding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding expert witness testimony where plaintiff failed to timely identify the witness "without substantial justification"
Luke v. Family Care Urgent Med. Clinics
323 F. App'x 496 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 107 timesHolding district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding untimely expert declarations
Cochran v. Brinkmann Corporation
1:08-cv-1790-WSD (N.D. Ga. Dec. 9, 2009) Cited 33 times1:08-cv-1790-WSD. December 9, 2009 OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM DUFFEY JR., District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Brinkmann Corporation's ("Defendant") Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Report Pursuant to Rule 26(e)(2) and Exclude the Supplemental Reports and Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Harry Edmondson [154], Defendant's Daubert Motion to Exclude Harry N. Edmondson [166], Defendant's Daubert Motion to Exclude Dr. Kenneth Laughery [167], Defendant's Motion to Strike
Cochran v. the Brinkmann Corp.
381 F. App'x 968 (11th Cir. 2010) Cited 10 timesNo. 09-16505 Non-Argument Calendar. June 9, 2010. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 08-01790-CV-WSD-1. Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Appellants Jesse Cole Cochran and Danielle M. Cochran appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Brinkmann Corporation on the Cochrans' product liability claim. Appellants also appeal two other decisions of the district court: (1) excluding the late-filed supplemental
Pickens v. U.S.
750 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (D. Or. 2010) Cited 4 timesNo. 08-cv-6305-PK. November 10, 2010. David R. Kracke, Craig A. Nichols, Nichols Associates, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff. Ronald K. Silver, Sean E. Martin, United States Attorneys Office, Portland, OR, for Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Marlene Pickens filed this negligence action against defendant United States of America arising out of alleged injuries to her hearing as a result of an alarm on a U.S. Postal Service vending machine. This court has
Powell v. Tosh
276 F.R.D. 553 (W.D. Ky. 2011) Cited 1 times[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Diana Riddick, Benton, KY, Elizabeth R. Bennett, Louisville, KY, John S. Harbison, Colchester, VT, Randal A. Strobo, W. Henry Graddy, IV, W.H. Graddy & Associates, Midway, KY, Jerome P. Prather, William R. Garmer, Garmer & Prather PLLC, Lexington, KY, for Plaintiffs. Donald L. Miller, II, Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, PA, Brian Scott Jones, Matthew T. Lockaby, Reminger Co., LPA, Louisville, KY, Drew B. Meadows, John William Walters
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 99,217 times 679 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 Cited 47,664 times 331 Legal AnalysesHolding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
Rule 104 - Preliminary Questions
Fed. R. Evid. 104 Cited 3,409 times 13 Legal AnalysesNoting that, in making preliminary determinations relevant to admissibility, "the court is not bound by evidence rules, except those on privilege"
Rule 2 - One Form of Action
Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 Cited 715 times 1 Legal AnalysesProviding for "one form of action to be known as 'civil action,'" in lieu of discretely labeled actions at law and suits in equity