24 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,210 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Batzel v. Smith

    333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 359 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion is appealable under § 1291
  3. Gomez v. Campbell-Ewald Co.

    768 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 154 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding principals liable under the TCPA for agents’ phone calls
  4. Ball v. Kotter

    723 F.3d 813 (7th Cir. 2013)   Cited 157 times
    Affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of attorney because plaintiff did not provide expert testimony regarding an attorney's standard of care related to conflicts of interest and also stressing that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct does not alone establish liability for legal malpractice.
  5. Opp v. Wheaton Van Lines, Inc.

    231 F.3d 1060 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 148 times
    Holding that reasonable fact finder could conclude that agent had no apparent authority to sign bill of lading limiting principal's liability, in part, because principal previously told mover that she wanted to insure her property for its full value
  6. Schaffer v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Prod., Inc.

    74 F.3d 722 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 155 times
    Affirming district court's refusal to consider Rule 56(f) affidavit where "Plaintiffs have not explained why they did not bring Defendants' alleged numerous failures to comply with discovery requests to the attention of the court in a timely manner"
  7. Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp.

    582 F. App'x 678 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 60 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff failed to plead apparent authority theory where the "[plaintiff] has not shown that she reasonably relied, much less to her detriment, on the apparent authority with which the [defendant] allegedly cloaked the [third parties to violate the TCPA]"
  8. Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp.

    879 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (C.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 64 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant could not be held vicariously liable for alleged TCPA violations because the defendant did not exercise control over the "manner and means" by which a text message campaign was designed and executed
  9. Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    30 F. Supp. 3d 765 (N.D. Ill. 2014)   Cited 51 times
    Holding vicarious liability adequately pleaded under similar circumstances
  10. Jackson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc.

    88 F. Supp. 3d 129 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding allegations of a contract between cruise line and telemarketer sending text message did not allege power to give interim instructions, and non-conclusory allegations failed to "nudge" claims "across the line from conceivable to plausible"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,736 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 227 - Restrictions on use of telephone equipment

    47 U.S.C. § 227   Cited 5,663 times   733 Legal Analyses
    Granting exclusive jurisdiction to federal courts over actions brought by state attorney generals