521 U.S. 591 (1997) Cited 6,954 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts are "bound to enforce" Rule 23's certification requirements, even where it means decertifying a class after they had reached a settlement agreement and submitted it to the court for approval
527 U.S. 815 (1999) Cited 931 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that "a fairness hearing under Rule 23(e) is no substitute for rigorous adherence to those provisions of the Rule designed to protect absentees"
Holding that the trustee breached his duties when: the trustee relied on incorrect information; the trustee was generally unaware of what was going on; the trustee was not consulted on major decisions; there was no negotiation as to the stock price; there was more concern for the return on investment for the Master Trust; and the ESOP was charged several thousand dollars more so that defendants could deal in round numbers
Holding that "the district court acted justifiably in rebuffing the appellants' proffered counter-statement and crediting Phillip Morris' version of the facts; [since] the appellants did not admit, deny or qualify [its] assertions of fact paragraph by paragraph as required by Local Rule 56."
Invalidating "any provision in an agreement or instrument which purports to relieve a fiduciary from responsibility or liability for any responsibility, obligation or duty."