29 Cited authorities

  1. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,966 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  2. Dillon v. City of New York

    261 A.D.2d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 869 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[d]efamation has long been recognized to arise from the making of a false statement which tends to expose the plaintiff to public contempt, ridicule, aversion or disgrace, or induce an evil opinion of him in the minds of right-thinking persons, and to deprive him of their friendly intercourse in society."
  3. Celle v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises

    209 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 460 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to recover in libel under New York law, the plaintiff must establish that the defamatory statement was, among other things, published to a third party through the defendant's negligence or actual malice
  4. Brian v. Richardson

    87 N.Y.2d 46 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 393 times
    Holding that an article advocating for a government investigation into purported misuse of software would be understood, in context, "as mere allegations to be investigated rather than as facts"
  5. Steinhilber v. Alphonse

    68 N.Y.2d 283 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 508 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing a distinction between pure opinion, which “does not imply that it is based upon undisclosed facts,” and mixed opinion, which “implies that it is based upon facts which justify the opinion but are unknown to those reading or hearing it”
  6. Mann v. Abel

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2675 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 240 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Mann v. Abel, 10 N.Y.3d 271, 856 N.Y.S.2d 31, 885 N.E.2d 884 (2008), the New York Court of Appeals examined a "piece, preceded by an editorial note indicating that it was an expression of opinion, [that] referred to Mann[, the town attorney,] as a ‘political hatchet Mann’ and said that he was ‘leading the Town of Rye to destruction.’ "
  7. Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart

    42 N.Y.2d 369 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 599 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "[o]pinions, false or not, libelous or not, are constitutionally protected and may not be the subject of private damage actions"
  8. Immuno Ag. v. Moor-Jankowski

    77 N.Y.2d 235 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 377 times
    Holding that the New York State Constitution independently provides protection for statements of opinion greater than those required by the First Amendment
  9. Salvatore v. Kumar

    45 A.D.3d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding defamation claim properly dismissed for failure to state a claim where, inter alia, "plaintiffs failed to show that readers of the Report, which does not identify them by name but instead refers generally to certain 'executives and personnel' would be able to discern from the facts referred to in the Report that any defamatory statements were 'of and concerning' them"
  10. 600 West 115th Street Corp. v. Von Gutfeld

    80 N.Y.2d 130 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 235 times
    Holding that "[t]he allegation of ‘denigration’ " is not actionable because, "[w]hether defined as ‘cast[ing] aspersions on’ or ‘belittl[ing]’ ... the term falls far short of any requirement of verifiability"
  11. Section 201 - Short title

    29 U.S.C. § 201   Cited 21,222 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work
  12. Section 1595 - Civil remedy

    18 U.S.C. § 1595   Cited 670 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing private plaintiffs to "recover damages" but not speaking to injunctive relief
  13. Section 74 - Privileges in action for libel

    N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 74   Cited 394 times   4 Legal Analyses

    A civil action cannot be maintained against any person, firm or corporation, for the publication of a fair and true report of any judicial proceeding, legislative proceeding or other official proceeding, or for any heading of the report which is a fair and true headnote of the statement published. This section does not apply to a libel contained in any other matter added by any person concerned in the publication; or in the report of anything said or done at the time and place of such a proceeding