§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Austin Cornelius, Appellant.

Brief

83 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 17,395 times   82 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause bars "admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination"

  2. Davis v. Washington

    547 U.S. 813 (2006)   Cited 4,794 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements made "in the course of police interrogation" are testimonial when made under "circumstances objectively indicat[ing] ... that the primary purpose of the interrogation [was] to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution"

  3. Melendez–Diaz v. Massachusetts

    557 U.S. 305 (2009)   Cited 3,546 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a certification that material seized by the police included cocaine was testimonial

  4. Michigan v. Bryant

    562 U.S. 344 (2011)   Cited 1,578 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements made to police concerning an ongoing emergency are not testimonial

  5. Bullcoming v. New Mexico

    564 U.S. 647 (2011)   Cited 1,546 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding a certification of the blood alcohol content of a sample to be testimonial

  6. Ohio v. Roberts

    448 U.S. 56 (1980)   Cited 4,630 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the question of good-faith effort is a question of reasonableness, and a prosecutor is not required to do a futile act

  7. Davis v. Alaska

    415 U.S. 308 (1974)   Cited 5,685 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this confrontation right is applicable to state and federal defendants alike

  8. Idaho v. Wright

    497 U.S. 805 (1990)   Cited 1,691 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to have "particularized guarantees of trustworthiness," hearsay evidence "must possess indicia of reliability by virtue of its inherent trustworthiness, not by reference to other evidence at trial"

  9. Pointer v. Texas

    380 U.S. 400 (1965)   Cited 4,289 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him is likewise a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment”

  10. California v. Green

    399 U.S. 149 (1970)   Cited 2,914 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Confrontation Clause does not require excluding from evidence the prior statements of a witness who concedes making those statements"

  11. Section 140.25 - Burglary in the second degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 140.25   Cited 1,368 times
    Describing second degree burglary as a crime when one "[k]nowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime therein, and when: . . . [t]he building is a dwelling."

  12. Section 140.10 - Criminal trespass in the third degree

    N.Y. Penal Law § 140.10   Cited 251 times   1 Legal Analyses

    A person is guilty of criminal trespass in the third degree when he knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building or upon real property (a) which is fenced or otherwise enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders; or (b) where the building is utilized as an elementary or secondary school or a children's overnight camp as defined in section one thousand three hundred ninety-two of the public health law or a summer day camp as defined in section one thousand three hundred ninety-two of