10 Cited authorities

  1. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 10,343 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth and Fourteenth amendments include the "right to proceed without counsel" when a criminal defendant "voluntarily and intelligently elects to do so"
  2. Gideon v. Wainwright

    372 U.S. 335 (1963)   Cited 7,865 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment requires counsel in all state felony prosecutions
  3. Kuhlmann v. Wilson

    477 U.S. 436 (1986)   Cited 1,183 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no Sixth Amendment violation had occurred where the defendant's statements to the informant were volunteered and the volunteering of the information was precipitated by events beyond the informant's control
  4. Massiah v. United States

    377 U.S. 201 (1964)   Cited 2,546 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding police violated Massiah's Sixth Amendment right to counsel when they “deliberately elicited” incriminating statements from him
  5. Maine v. Moulton

    474 U.S. 159 (1985)   Cited 1,048 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state's use of informant to obtain incriminating evidence from defendant about pending charges violated defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel, notwithstanding that state was also investigating other charges as to which the Sixth Amendment right to counsel had not attached
  6. United States v. Henry

    447 U.S. 264 (1980)   Cited 819 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Massiah applies in cases involving jailhouse informants
  7. U.S. v. Brink

    39 F.3d 419 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that the District Court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing where the defendant stated "a colorable claim that the government violated his constitutional right to counsel by placing him in a cell with a known informant who may have been acting as a government agent"
  8. People v. Cardona

    41 N.Y.2d 333 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Cardona, the New York Court of Appeals reviewed a defendant's claim that the trial court had erroneously held, after a suppression hearing, that a fellow inmate's statements were not made in violation of the Massiah rule.
  9. People v. Corse

    73 A.D.3d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 9 times

    No. 2008-07864. May 25, 2010. Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Honoroff, J.), rendered June 30, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree (two counts), attempted criminal sale of a firearm in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, hindering prosecution in the third degree, and criminal facilitation in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict,

  10. People v. Johnson

    120 A.D.3d 1154 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 2 times

    2014-09-30 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcellus JOHNSON, Defendant–Appellant. Cardozo Appeals Clinic, New York (Stanley Neustadter of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent. Cardozo Appeals Clinic, New York (Stanley Neustadter of counsel), for appellant.Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Allen J. Vickey of counsel), for respondent. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia