§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Marcellus Johnson, Appellant.

Brief

4 Cited authorities

  1. Maine v. Moulton

    474 U.S. 159 (1985)   Cited 1,140 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state's use of informant to obtain incriminating evidence from defendant about pending charges violated defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel, notwithstanding that state was also investigating other charges as to which the Sixth Amendment right to counsel had not attached

  2. United States v. Henry

    447 U.S. 264 (1980)   Cited 878 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Massiah applies in cases involving jailhouse informants

  3. United States v. Levy

    577 F.2d 200 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that "the inquiry into prejudice must stop" where defense strategy material is actually disclosed to the prosecution or the government intentionally sought such confidential information

  4. People v. Cardona

    41 N.Y.2d 333 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Cardona, the New York Court of Appeals reviewed a defendant's claim that the trial court had erroneously held, after a suppression hearing, that a fellow inmate's statements were not made in violation of the Massiah rule.