§Why CasetextPricing

Beyond Systems, Inc. v. World Avenue USA, LLC et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss for Fraud on the Court

8 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. v. Shaffer Equipment Co.

    11 F.3d 450 (4th Cir. 1993)   Cited 861 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to disclose information that "could conceivably have affected the outcome of the litigation ... violates the general duty of candor that attorneys owe as officers of the court"

  2. Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

    303 Md. 397 (Md. 1985)   Cited 112 times
    In Keys, Anna Keys's wages were attached by a writ of garnishment issued to enforce a judgment that Keys had fully satisfied more than four years earlier.

  3. Norman v. Borison

    192 Md. App. 405 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2010)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that the owner of an LLC does not have standing to pursue defamation claim stemming from defamatory statements made about the LLC

  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. Hillman

    285 Md. 161 (Md. 1979)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that a defamatory per se statement is one where no "proof of extrinsic facts is necessary" to demonstrate its defamatory character

  5. Higginbotham v. KCS Intern., Inc.

    202 F.R.D. 444 (D. Md. 2001)   Cited 31 times

    Disputes which arose during pretrial discovery in personal injury case were referred to Magistrate Judge for resolution. The District Court, Bredar, United States Magistrate Judge, held that: (1) failure by plaintiff's counsel to respond directly to request for estimate of duration of deposition fell short of good faith effort to resolve dispute; (2) defendant's counsel acted improperly when he told deponent that he could leave deposition before completion; (3) plaintiff's counsel intentionally terminated

  6. Gooch v. Maryland Mechanical

    81 Md. App. 376 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1990)   Cited 45 times
    Affirming a trial court's entry of summary judgment because the claimant failed to present admissible evidence of damages

  7. Dixon v. DeLance

    579 A.2d 1213 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1991)   Cited 11 times

    No. 1908, September Term, 1989. October 1, 1990. Certiorari Denied January 4, 1991. Appeal from the Circuit Court, Baltimore County, John F. Fader, II, J. Carol L. McCulloch, Towson, for appellant. Alvin I. Frederick and Kenneth H. Meltzer (Eccelston and Wolf on the brief), Baltimore, for appellees. Argued before KARWACKI, ROBERT M. BELL and WENNER, JJ. KARWACKI, Judge. This appeal concerns the applicability of the privileges possessed by an attorney and his client to publish defamatory statements

  8. Wetherby v. Retail Credit

    201 A.2d 344 (Md. 1964)   Cited 6 times

    [No. 359, September Term, 1963.] Decided June 9, 1964. LIBEL — Instructions To Jury — Court Did Not Prejudice Appellants In Instructing Jury That The Truth Or Falsity Of Words Claimed To Be Defamatory Was Not An Issue In The Case, Particularly Where Court Added That Even If Words Were Otherwise Libelous, They Were Not Actionable If Published In The Exercise Of A Qualified Privilege Without Abuse. In the instant case, a suit by two individuals who were engaged in the real estate and mortgage business