§Why CasetextPricing

Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Kraft Foods, Inc. et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION to Stay re Status Report

9 Cited authorities

  1. Tilley v. U.S.

    270 F. Supp. 2d 731 (M.D.N.C. 2003)   Cited 83 times
    Concluding that various documents, including a notice of intent to levy and notice of liens, are sufficient to satisfy the statutory notice and demand requirements, because "the form on which a notice of assessment and demand for payment is made is irrelevant as long as it provides the taxpayer with all the information required"

  2. Pradier v. Elespuru

    641 F.2d 808 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that, where the body of a pleading contains a jury trial demand, the pleading need not also state in its caption that a jury trial is requested in order to comply with Rule 38(b) — even if a district court rule requires such a statement

  3. Starr International Co., Inc. v. American Intl. Grp.

    623 F. Supp. 2d 497 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 9 times

    No. 05 Civ. 6283 (JSR). June 4, 2009 Robert Silver, David Boies, of Counsel: Robert G. Morvillo, John L. Gardiner, Boies, Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff Starr International Co., Inc. Martin Flumenbaum, Theodore V. Wells, Jr., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant American International Group, Inc. MEMORANDUM ORDER JED RAKOFF, District Judge In connection with the trial of this case, firmly scheduled to begin on June 15, 2009, the parties disagree

  4. American River Transporation Company v. Paragon Marine Ser.

    213 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (E.D. Mo. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Comparing negligence of defendants versus plaintiffs on basis of written plans for barge safety

  5. American River Transp. v. Paragon Marine Serv

    329 F.3d 946 (8th Cir. 2003)   Cited 7 times
    Noting that appellants must raise issues in their opening briefs

  6. Popoola v. MD-Individual Practice Association, Inc.

    Civil Action No. DKC 2000-2946 (D. Md. May. 23, 2001)   Cited 3 times

    Civil Action No. DKC 2000-2946 May 23, 2001 MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, U.S. District Judge Pending before the court and ready for resolution is Plaintiff Shade Popoola's Motion to Stay or, in the alternative, to Remand to State Court. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant M.D.-Individual Practice Association, Inc., ("M.D. IPA") asserted liens on and subrogation interests in certain recoveries received by its insureds from third party tortfeasors in violation of anti-subrogation provisions

  7. Mitchell v. Visser

    529 F. Supp. 1034 (D. Kan. 1981)   Cited 13 times

    No. 78-4189. December 17, 1981. Terry D. Watson, Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff. Leslie A. Kulick and Reid Stacey, Asst. Attys. Gen., Topeka, Kan., Gerald T. Elliott, Sheila M. Janicke, Schnider, Shamberg May, Chartered, Shawnee Mission, Kan., Bruce E. Miller, Deputy Atty. Gen., State of Kan., Topeka, Kan., for defendants. William H. Seiler, Jr., Lehmberg, Bremyer, Wise Hopp, McPherson, Kan., for William H. Seiler. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROGERS, District Judge. Plaintiff, a former tenured professor at

  8. Mallory v. Citizens Utilities Company

    342 F.2d 796 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times

    No. 366, Docket 29006. Argued January 29, 1965. Decided March 12, 1965. Frederick J. Fayette, Burlington, Vt. (Kenneth P. Akey, Burlington, Vt., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee. Milton S. Gould, New York City, Clifton G. Parker, Morrisville, Vt. (Shea, Gallop, Climenko Gould, and Norman Solovay, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Before WATERMAN, SMITH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. In 1962, and for a number of years prior thereto, litigation had

  9. Rule 39 - Trial by Jury or by the Court

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 39   Cited 1,816 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Granting the trial court the power to determine that "a right of trial by jury of some or all of those issues does not exist under the Constitution or statutes of the United States"