435 U.S. 589 (1978) Cited 5,991 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing" can constitute a sufficient reason to preserve records under seal
470 U.S. 821 (1985) Cited 2,037 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute did not provide meaningful standards because it did not "speak to the criteria which shall be used by the agency for investigating possible violations of the [statute]"
455 U.S. 363 (1982) Cited 2,025 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that an allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff organization "has had to devote significant resources to identify and counteract the defendant's" illegal practices was sufficient to confer standing to the organization in its own right at the pleading stage
558 U.S. 233 (2010) Cited 643 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 1252(B), which governs judicial review of discretionary decisions made by the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security, "does not proscribe judicial review of denials of motions to reopen"
397 U.S. 150 (1970) Cited 2,469 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]here can be no doubt" that the plaintiffs have Article III standing because they "allege that competition [resulting from the challenged regulation] might entail some future loss of profits for [them]"
524 U.S. 11 (1998) Cited 778 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that inability to procure information to which Congress has created a right in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 qualifies as concrete injury satisfying Article III's standing requirement
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Cited 97,127 times 133 Legal Analyses
Finding that in order to invoke federal question jurisdiction, a plaintiff's claims must arise "under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Cited 34,849 times 1232 Legal Analyses
Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 Cited 9,505 times 54 Legal Analyses
Holding a person must be joined if disposing the action in the person's absence may leave an existing party subject to a "substantial" risk of incurring inconsistent obligations
42 U.S.C. § 12188 Cited 1,329 times 5 Legal Analyses
Providing that the remedies available to individuals are set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 2000a-3, which allows a private right of action only for injunctive relief for violations of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
42 U.S.C. § 7413 Cited 560 times 17 Legal Analyses
Granting the Administrator discretion to extend the ambient air quality standard attainment date set in the 1977 Act by up to three years for steelmaking facilities
Fed. R. Civ. P. 66 Cited 338 times 2 Legal Analyses
Providing that "the practice in administering an estate by a receiver or similar court-appointed officer must accord with the historical practice in federal courts or with a local rule"
Stating that any person who has "willfully or repeatedly failed to comply with any of the provisions of this chapter or of any rule, regulation, or order issued by the Commission under this chapter . . . shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty"
Reciting "the vital public interest in open judicial proceedings" and stating the policy that DOJ counsel "shall not move for or consent to closure of a proceeding" unless "[n]o reasonable alternative exists for protecting the interests at stake" and "[f]ailure to close the proceedings will produce . . . substantial likelihood of denial of the right . . . to a fair trial"