§Why CasetextPricing

Bethea v. District of Columbia et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Entry of Default against defendant Center for Correctional Health and Policy Studies

3 Cited authorities

  1. Whitehead v. CBS/Viacom, Inc.

    221 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 41 times
    Granting motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process under Rule 4(h) when the plaintiff served an individual corporate representative not authorized to receive service of process

  2. Johnson v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc.

    841 A.2d 1249 (D.C. 2004)   Cited 3 times

    No. 02-CV-1182 Argued November 4, 2003. Decided February 5, 2004 Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-7273-01) (Hon. William M. Jackson, Motions Judge), (Hon. Michael L. Rankin, Trial Judge). Edwin C. Brown, Jr. for appellants. Juli Z. Simonyi, with whom Aaron Handleman was on the brief, for appellee. Before TERRY and RUIZ, Associate Judges, and KING, Senior Judge. RUIZ, Associate Judge: Plaintiff-appellant, Karen Johnson, appeals the trial court's decision to grant the

  3. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,368 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time