Majewski v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
274 F.3d 1106 (6th Cir. 2001) Cited 460 timesHolding that even if the employer's reason turns out be incorrect, it cannot establish pretext if the employer had an honest belief that it was legitimate
Janikowski v. Bendix Corp.
823 F.2d 945 (6th Cir. 1987) Cited 200 timesHolding that denial of a motion to amend the complaint was an abuse of discretion because the motion was filed before discovery had been completed
Woods v. McGuire
954 F.2d 388 (6th Cir. 1992) Cited 33 timesHolding there was no abuse of discretion where district court closed discovery almost two years after tort case involving the Westfall Act was filed
Perfection Corp. v. Dresser Industries, Inc.
641 F. Supp. 782 (W.D. Pa. 1986) Cited 2 timesCiv. A. No. 83-335 ERIE. August 25, 1986. Edward W. Goebel, Jr., Erie, Pa., Christopher B. Fagan, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff. Richard R. Nelson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant. OPINION GERALD J. WEBER, District Judge. When plaintiff amended its complaint to add a claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., the amendment spawned a raft of pleadings—three motions and six briefs or letters directly related to it. Presently pending is defendant's
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,949 times 653 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 Cited 33,703 times 51 Legal AnalysesAdopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)