On defendant's motion for reconsideration of joinder order, the District Court, Edenfield, J., held that amended complaint was sufficient for maintaining joinder of plaintiffs in employment discrimination action even though it did not inform court of facts necessary for it to conclude whether the claims were reasonably related and bore a logical relationship to each other. Motion denied. Amanda Williams, Brunswick, Ga., Fletcher Farrington, Louisa Abbott, Savannah, Ga., for plaintiffs. James Allan
Civ. A. No. 77-412-T. June 7, 1979. Grey Redditt, Jr., Ben H. Kilborn, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff. Norman E. Waldrop, Jr., W. Boyd Reeves, Mobile, Ala., for American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. et al. Peter V. Sintz, Robert G. Kendall, Mobile, Ala., for Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp., Inc. Robert H. Smith, Mobile, Ala., for Mission Ins. Co. James J. Duffy, Jr., E.L. McCafferty, III, Mobile, Ala., for Transamerica Insurance Co. Michael D. Knight, Mobile, Ala., for Zurich American Ins. James C. Wood
(a) Capacity. It is not necessary to aver the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity or the legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party. When a party desires to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party or the capacity of any party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity, the party desiring to raise the issue shall do so by specific