21 Cited authorities

  1. Carden v. Arkoma Associates

    494 U.S. 185 (1990)   Cited 2,557 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that limited partnerships are deemed citizens of every state where any partner resides
  2. Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

    116 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,989 times
    Holding that employees "who have not suffered an injury in that they have been covered by Medicare for the medical care they have received retain a sufficient interest in this action for purposes of the Constitutional 'case or controversy' requirement"
  3. U.S. ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp.

    290 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2002)   Cited 837 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding Rule 9(b) applies to False Claims Act claims
  4. Ziemba v. Cascade Intern., Inc.

    256 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2001)   Cited 767 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 9(b) satisfied if "complaint sets forth precisely what statements were made in what documents or oral representations or what omissions were made, and the time and place of each statement and the person responsible for making it, . . . the content of such statements and the manner in which they misled plaintiffs, and what defendants obtained as a consequence of the fraud"
  5. Magluta v. Samples

    256 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2001)   Cited 549 times
    Holding that a complaint was a shotgun complaint when, among other issues, the complaint was 58-pages long and contained at least 146 numbered paragraphs
  6. Potter v. Clark

    497 F.2d 1206 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 762 times
    Holding that court properly dismissed pro se complaint where complaint did not allege that defendant committed specific act and complaint was silent as to defendant except for his name appearing in caption
  7. Durham v. Business Management Associates

    847 F.2d 1505 (11th Cir. 1988)   Cited 353 times
    Holding allegation of use of the mails sufficient, where plaintiffs' allegation that "correspondence and other communications concerning [the alleged scheme to defraud] took place through . . . the mails" was supported by an attached affidavit from a recipient describing such correspondence, even though dates and times of mailings were not stated
  8. Friedlander v. Nims

    755 F.2d 810 (11th Cir. 1985)   Cited 254 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that dismissal with prejudice was not an abuse of discretion when the court gave the pro se plaintiff a chance to amend
  9. Toms v. Country Quality Meats, Inc.

    610 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that plaintiff must plead citizenship "distinctly and affirmatively"
  10. Summer v. Land Leisure, Inc.

    664 F.2d 965 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 71 times
    Finding that "[w]hen a party has failed to plead with sufficient particularity, the Court will almost always permit leave to amend to bring the complaint into compliance with the requirements of Rule 9(b)."
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 362,607 times   962 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 116,150 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  14. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 40,207 times   337 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  15. Section 1391 - Venue generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1391   Cited 29,289 times   200 Legal Analyses
    Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred