§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Deborah Sagal-Cotler, Appellant,v.Board of Education of the City School District of The City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Brief

8 Cited authorities

  1. In re Dutchess County Dept. of Social Ser., v. Day

    96 N.Y.2d 149 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 62 times

    Decided May 3, 2001. Appeal, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered February 28, 2000, which affirmed an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Damian J. Amodeo, J.), denying objections to two orders of that Family Court (Esther R. Furman, H.E.) that directed respondents to pay a total of $4,375 as reimbursement to petitioner for money it expended on behalf of respondents' minor child while

  2. Matter of Williams v. City of New York

    64 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 60 times
    In Williams, the court held that a determination by the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York that a New York City correction officer acted outside the scope of employment when he committed acts for which he was later sued was controlling on the duty to defend, subject only to an arbitrary and capricious standard of review.

  3. Timmerman v. N.Y

    50 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 12 times
    In Timmerman, the Appellate Division, First Department ordered DOE to reimburse petitioner for the attorneys' fees and expenses he incurred in defending himself against criminal charges.

  4. Perez v. City of New York

    43 A.D.3d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 11 times

    No. 1503-1503A. September 18, 2007. Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered December 16, 2005, after a jury trial, awarding plaintiff damages in the principal sum of $1.1 million, and judgment, same court and Justice, entered December 6, 2005, which, after a hearing before Anne E. Targum, J., awarded defendant Healy indemnification against defendant City for legal fees and expenses in the amount of $31,000, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and

  5. Farrington v. Pinckney

    1 N.Y.2d 74 (N.Y. 1956)   Cited 95 times
    In Farrington v. Pinckney (1 N.Y.2d 74, 80, 81), the court said: "In order to be deemed general, unless the act applies to all places in the State (e.g., all the counties), it must create a class.

  6. Blood v. Board of Educ

    121 A.D.2d 128 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 26 times
    In Blood, when a teacher who was angered by a student snatched his book bag from him, the bag struck another student and injured her (121 A.D.2d at 130–131, 509 N.Y.S.2d 530).

  7. Matter of Inglis v. Dundee Central School Dist. Bd.

    (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Mar. 1, 1999)   Cited 11 times
    Applying standard that governs duty to defend to a case that concerns only payment of defense expenses

  8. Section 19.5 - Prohibition of corporal punishment, aversive interventions, and seclusion and the authorized limited use of timeout and physical restraint

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 8 § 19.5   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining aversive interventions