§Why CasetextPricing

Opposition To Motion To Quash Service

Motion

8 Cited authorities

  1. Bauguess v. Paine

    22 Cal.3d 626 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 196 times
    Holding attorney's fees was improper use of supervisory powers

  2. Clark v. Optical Coating Lab

    165 Cal.App.4th 150 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 81 times
    Holding that the trial court's award of attorney fees against plaintiffs counsel for their violation of the order in limine did not fall within the court's inherent powers because "allowing the trial courts to impose attorney fees as sanctions for attorney misconduct without statutory protections would undermine due process and threaten the independence of the bar"

  3. Lavine v. Hospital of the Good Samaritan

    169 Cal.App.3d 1019 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 52 times
    Rejecting argument that § 128.5 procedure is unconstitutionally summary

  4. Ellis v. Roshei Corp.

    143 Cal.App.3d 642 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 52 times

    Docket No. 67308. June 3, 1983. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. 386464, Arthur Baldonado, Judge. COUNSEL Milton W. Kroah II for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant. Howard A. Erlich for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents. OPINION ROSS, J.[fn*] — [fn*] Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. SUMMARY In this appeal, we must determine whether Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 empowers the trial court to grant sanctions against an attorney who,

  5. Interstate Specialty Marketing, Inc. v. ICRA Sapphire, Inc.

    217 Cal.App.4th 708 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    G047376 2013-06-27 INTERSTATE SPECIALTY MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ICRA SAPPHIRE, INC., Defendant and Respondent. See 7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Trial, § 237 et seq.Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, David R. Chaffee, Judge. Reversed with directions. (Super. Ct. No. 30–2011–00495173) BEDSWORTH Vacated and remanded with directions. See 7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Trial, § 237 et seq. Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of

  6. Andrews v. Superior Court, Los Angeles County

    82 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 10 times
    Reversing order requiring attorney to pay such fees as a sanction pursuant to section 128

  7. Section 1608 - Service; time to answer; default

    28 U.S.C. § 1608   Cited 958 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service "through diplomatic channels"

  8. Rule 2.30 - Sanctions for rules violations in civil cases

    Cal. R. 2.30   Cited 34 times

    (a) Application This sanctions rule applies to the rules in the California Rules of Court relating to general civil cases, unlawful detainer cases, probate proceedings, civil proceedings in the appellate division of the superior court, and small claims cases. (b) Sanctions In addition to any other sanctions permitted by law, the court may order a person, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, to pay reasonable monetary sanctions to the court or an aggrieved person, or both, for failure