Docket No. 67308. June 3, 1983. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. 386464, Arthur Baldonado, Judge. COUNSEL Milton W. Kroah II for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant. Howard A. Erlich for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents. OPINION ROSS, J.[fn*] — [fn*] Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. SUMMARY In this appeal, we must determine whether Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 empowers the trial court to grant sanctions against an attorney who,
G047376 2013-06-27 INTERSTATE SPECIALTY MARKETING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ICRA SAPPHIRE, INC., Defendant and Respondent. See 7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Trial, § 237 et seq.Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, David R. Chaffee, Judge. Reversed with directions. (Super. Ct. No. 30–2011–00495173) BEDSWORTH Vacated and remanded with directions. See 7 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Trial, § 237 et seq. Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of
(a) Application This sanctions rule applies to the rules in the California Rules of Court relating to general civil cases, unlawful detainer cases, probate proceedings, civil proceedings in the appellate division of the superior court, and small claims cases. (b) Sanctions In addition to any other sanctions permitted by law, the court may order a person, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, to pay reasonable monetary sanctions to the court or an aggrieved person, or both, for failure