Benach v. County of Los Angeles
149 Cal.App.4th 836 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 936 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding photocopying costs for exhibits prepared for use at trial were recoverable under discretionary provision of § 1033.5, subd. (c)
Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.
19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993) Cited 117 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision
Segal v. ASICS Am. Corp.
50 Cal.App.5th 659 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020) Cited 6 timesB299184 06-15-2020 Mickey SEGAL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ASICS AMERICA CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. Greenspoon Marder, James H. Turken and Rebecca Lawlor Calkins, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Sidley Austin, Jack S. Yeh, David R. Carpenter, Alexis Miller Buese, Collin P. Wedel, and Rara Kang, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents. CURREY, J. Greenspoon Marder, James H. Turken and Rebecca Lawlor Calkins, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants
Applegate v. St. Francis Lutheran Church
23 Cal.App.4th 361 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 30 times 1 Legal AnalysesLooking to section 1033.5, subdivision (c) as an alternative basis to allow exhibit-related costs not authorized by section 1033.5, subdivision