§Why CasetextPricing

Order_proposed_order_denying_defendants_motion_to_tax_costs

Motion

6 Cited authorities

  1. Wysinger v. Automobile Club of Southern California

    157 Cal.App.4th 413 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 230 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that these two statutory sections "involve separate causes of action and proof of different facts"

  2. Scott Co. v. Blount, Inc.

    20 Cal.4th 1103 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 291 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the plaintiff was a prevailing party despite the fact that the plaintiff originally sought $2 million in damages, but recovered only $440,000

  3. Weeks v. Baker McKenzie

    63 Cal.App.4th 1128 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 201 times
    Finding "evidence that persons who complained [about employee's sexual harassment] actions were transferred or were themselves terminated as employees" supported a finding that employer did not "take misconduct seriously" and consciously disregarded the rights of others

  4. Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.

    141 Cal.App.4th 1550 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 87 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Concluding "the trial court was well within its discretion in awarding travel costs to depositions"

  5. Rule 2.956 - Court reporting services in civil cases

    Cal. R. 2.956   Cited 33 times

    (a) Statutory reference; application This rule implements and must be applied so as to give effect to Government Code sections 68086(a) -(c). (b) Notice of availability; parties' request (1)Local policy to be adopted and posted Each trial court must adopt and post in the clerk's office a local policy enumerating the departments in which the services of official court reporters are normally available, and the departments in which the services of official court reporters are not normally available

  6. Rule 3.670 - Telephone appearance

    Cal. R. 3.670   Cited 28 times

    (a) Policy favoring telephone appearances The intent of this rule is to promote uniformity in the practices and procedures relating to telephone appearances in civil cases. To improve access to the courts and reduce litigation costs, courts should permit parties, to the extent feasible, to appear by telephone at appropriate conferences, hearings, and proceedings in civil cases. (Subd (a) adopted effective January 1, 2008.) (b) Application Subdivisions (c) through (i) of this rule are suspended from