Nestle v. City of Santa Monica
6 Cal.3d 920 (Cal. 1972) Cited 469 times
In Nestle we held, inter alia, that a nuisance action based on airport noise was improperly dismissed on the basis of government immunity, and suggested that the plaintiffs on remand might be able to demonstrate a continuing nuisance.
Mabie v. Hyatt
61 Cal.App.4th 581 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 51 times
Holding "in California coupling a justified charge with an unjustified charge does not shield a party from a malicious prosecution claim on the unjustified charge."
Davis v. Marin
80 Cal.App.4th 380 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 29 times
Treating the filing of a defective Doe amendment as the filing of an amended complaint, thereby suggesting the date of filing the Doe amendment is the operative date from which the statute of limitations is calculated
Streicher v. Tommy's Electric Co.
164 Cal.App.3d 876 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985) Cited 19 times
In Streicher v. Tommy's Electric Co. (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 876, the plaintiff sued a general contractor and subcontractor after a radio-controlled overhead garage door accidentally opened, causing him to fall from some scaffolding.