5 Cited authorities

  1. Foster v. Civil Service Com

    142 Cal.App.3d 444 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 71 times

    Docket No. 66493. April 27, 1983. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. C376412, Leon Savitch, Judge. COUNSEL Anthony J. Foster, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. John H. Larson, County Counsel, and Nancy M. Naftel, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION THOMPSON, J. Petitioner Anthony J. Foster sought a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to compel the respondents Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, Board of Supervisors and the Department

  2. Lazarus v. Titmus

    64 Cal.App.4th 1242 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 37 times

    Docket No. B103661. June 16, 1998. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC092680, Ronald E. Cappai, Judge. COUNSEL Leslie S. McAfee for Plaintiff and Appellant. Cairns, Doyle, Lans, Nicholas Soni, John C. Doyle and Cynthia L. Hoelzel for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION VOGEL (C.S.), P.J. In September of 1993, after an altercation in a parking lot, appellant Sanford Lazarus was hit by a car driven by respondent Ted Titmus. The car was owned by respondent Carol Forsythe. Appellant

  3. Section 21453 - Steady circular red signal; steady red arrow signal

    Cal. Veh. Code § 21453   Cited 108 times
    Running a stop light
  4. Section 68607 - Responsibility of judges

    Cal. Gov. Code § 68607   Cited 54 times

    In accordance with this article and consistent with statute, judges shall have the responsibility to eliminate delay in the progress and ultimate resolution of litigation, to assume and maintain control over the pace of litigation, to actively manage the processing of litigation from commencement to disposition, and to compel attorneys and litigants to prepare and resolve all litigation without delay, from the filing of the first document invoking court jurisdiction to final disposition of the action

  5. Rule 3.1332 - Motion or application for continuance of trial

    Cal. R. 3.1332   Cited 276 times

    (a) Trial dates are firm To ensure the prompt disposition of civil cases, the dates assigned for a trial are firm. All parties and their counsel must regard the date set for trial as certain. (b)Motion or application A party seeking a continuance of the date set for trial, whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the parties, must make the request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex parte application under the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with supporting declarations