10 Cited authorities

  1. Roby v. McKesson Corp.

    47 Cal.4th 686 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 539 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding "there is no basis for excluding evidence of biased personnel management actions so long as that evidence is relevant to prove the communication of a hostile message"
  2. Morgan v. Regents of University of California

    88 Cal.App.4th 52 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 652 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff "must obtain from the [DFEH] a notice of right to sue in order to be entitled to file a civil action in court based on violations of FEHA"
  3. Johnson v. City of Loma Linda

    24 Cal.4th 61 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 598 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an administrative finding is binding on subsequent FEHA claims when an employee pursues administrative remedies, receives an adverse finding, and fails to have the finding set aside through a successful mandate action in superior court
  4. Richards v. CH2M Hill, Inc.

    26 Cal.4th 798 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 403 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of FEHA claims, "[i]f the employer has made clear in word and deed that the employee's attempted further reasonable accommodation is futile, then the employee is on notice that litigation, not informal conciliation, is the only alternative for the vindication of his or her rights"
  5. Nadaf-Rahrov v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.

    166 Cal.App.4th 952 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 305 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's failure to engage in the interactive process is an unlawful employment practice . . . only if a reasonable accommodation existed."
  6. Chavez v. City of Los Angles

    47 Cal.4th 970 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 289 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reduced fee award is appropriate where a claimant achieves only limited success
  7. Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc.

    53 Cal.4th 1244 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 198 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding attorneys' fees “not authorized” for meal or rest period claims
  8. Lelaind v. City and County of San Francisco

    576 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (N.D. Cal. 2008)   Cited 186 times
    Holding that a manager's negative treatment could be found to be an adverse employment action if it "negatively and materially affected" the plaintiff's "ability to acquire and develop skills to advance up the career ladder"
  9. Miller v. United Airlines, Inc.

    174 Cal.App.3d 878 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 51 times
    Finding administrative exhaustion to be jurisdictional where no EEOC or DFEH charge was filed
  10. Section 11068 - Reasonable Accommodation

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11068   Cited 82 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting or extending a leave may be a reasonable accommodation "provided that the leave is likely to be effective in allowing the employee to return to work at the end of the leave ...."