§Why CasetextPricing

Motion_to_tax_costs

Motion

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 287 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"

  2. Jensen v. BMW of North America, Inc.

    35 Cal.App.4th 112 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 232 times
    Holding that by including "expenses" in the Song Beverly Act's cost provision, the Legislature intended that the provision would not be limited to the costs that are available under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. Section 1033,5, which defines the items that are generally available to prevailing parties

  3. Ripley v. Pappadopoulos

    23 Cal.App.4th 1616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that Federal Express charges are expressly disallowed—presumably because they constitute "postage"

  4. Whatley–Miller v. Cooper

    212 Cal.App.4th 1103 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Approving acceptance that included a place for the attorney's signature

  5. Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises

    4 Cal.App.4th 238 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 29 times

    Docket No. F015043. March 5, 1992. [Opinion certified for partial publication.] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and IV. Appeal from Superior Court of Fresno County, No. 423282-3, James L. Quaschnick, Judge. COUNSEL Thomas Nast for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lawrence A. Haun and Roger A. Brown for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION STONE (W.A.), Acting P.J. In the published portion of this opinion we will conclude