4 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Kelly

    1 Cal.4th 495 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,283 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in exclusion of evidence that murder victims had alcohol or cocaine in their systems
  2. Jones v. Moore

    80 Cal.App.4th 557 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 63 times
    Noting "it would be grossly unfair and prejudicial to permit" additional expert opinion at trial, when in deposition the expert affirmatively stated that the specific opinions given were the only ones he intended to offer
  3. Dozier v. Shapiro

    199 Cal.App.4th 1509 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 21 times

    No. B224316. 2011-09-27 Robert DOZIER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Michael R. SHAPIRO et al., Defendants and Respondents. Law Office of Gerald Philip Peters, Gerald Philip Peters, Aquora Hills; Law Officesof Scott D. Bernstein and Scott D. Bernstein, Beverly Hills, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen & McKenna, John C. Kelly and David P. Pruett, Long Beach, for Defendants and Respondents. CHANEY Law Office of Gerald Philip Peters, Gerald Philip Peters, Aquora Hills; Law

  4. Section 352 - Balancing of probative value with prejudice

    Cal. Evid. Code § 352   Cited 13,079 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Giving a trial court discretion to exclude evidence "if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury"