58 Cited authorities

  1. Smith v. Robbins

    528 U.S. 259 (2000)   Cited 6,337 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the proper standard for evaluating claim that appellate counsel was ineffective . . . is that enunciated in Strickland"
  2. United States v. Cronic

    466 U.S. 648 (1984)   Cited 6,288 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a finding of ineffective assistance of trial counsel must be based on actual specified errors and not merely the circumstances surrounding the representation
  3. Barker v. Wingo

    407 U.S. 514 (1972)   Cited 10,001 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant who fails to demand speedy trial does not forever waive that constitutional right
  4. Edwards v. Arizona

    451 U.S. 477 (1981)   Cited 5,824 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding statement "I want an attorney before making a deal" triggered Miranda rights
  5. U.S. v. Gonzalez-Lopez

    548 U.S. 140 (2006)   Cited 1,639 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice does not require showing prejudice
  6. Evitts v. Lucey

    469 U.S. 387 (1985)   Cited 3,887 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the right to effective assistance of counsel includes the right to effective assistance of appellate counsel
  7. Johnson v. Zerbst

    304 U.S. 458 (1938)   Cited 8,318 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing and intelligent
  8. Griffin v. Illinois

    351 U.S. 12 (1956)   Cited 3,013 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preventing an indigent defendant from appealing his conviction due to his failure to pay for a trial transcript is unconstitutional
  9. Halbert v. Michigan

    545 U.S. 605 (2005)   Cited 429 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses require the appointment of counsel for indigent defendants seeking first-tier review of guilty or nolo contendere pleas in the intermediate state court of appeals, whose function is to review and "correct errors made by the lower courts," even though such review is discretionary under state law
  10. Degen v. United States

    517 U.S. 820 (1996)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court could not apply the doctrine to refuse a criminal fugitive's answer in a related civil forfeiture case
  11. Section 3006A - Adequate representation of defendants

    18 U.S.C. § 3006A   Cited 12,226 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting defendants an ex parte forum to request reimbursement for supplemental services