§Why CasetextPricing

Motion_to_tax_costs

Motion

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 287 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"

  2. Jones v. Dumrichob

    63 Cal.App.4th 1258 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 152 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion in awarding expert fees pursuant to a section 998 offer consisting of a cost waiver, but no monetary amount

  3. Oak Grove School Dist. v. City Title Ins. Co.

    217 Cal.App.2d 678 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)   Cited 93 times
    In Oak Grove SchoolDist. v. City Title Ins. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 288] defendants claimed costs and disbursements under Code of Civil Procedure section 1255a after the plaintiff school district abandoned its eminent domain proceeding.

  4. People v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.

    210 Cal.App.4th 1423 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 10 times
    Interpreting Pen. Code, § 1305.3

  5. Rule 8.278 - Costs on appeal

    Cal. R. 8.278   Cited 5,129 times

    (a)Award of costs (1) Except as provided in this rule, the party prevailing in the Court of Appeal in a civil case other than a juvenile case is entitled to costs on appeal. (2) The prevailing party is the respondent if the Court of Appeal affirms the judgment without modification or dismisses the appeal. The prevailing party is the appellant if the court reverses the judgment in its entirety. (3) If the Court of Appeal reverses the judgment in part or modifies it, or if there is more than one notice