§Why CasetextPricing

Millennium Holdings LLC, Plaintiff, The Northern Assurance Company of America, Appellant, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, et al., Intervenors-Appellants,v.The Glidden Company,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

26 Cited authorities

  1. Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila

    542 U.S. 200 (2004)   Cited 2,699 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states cannot create new causes of action that conflict with ERISA's " ‘interlocking, interrelated, and interdependent remedial scheme,’ " located in § 502 of ERISA

  2. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell

    538 U.S. 408 (2003)   Cited 2,668 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an award of $145 million in punitive damages on a $1 million compensatory verdict violated due process

  3. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran

    536 U.S. 355 (2002)   Cited 332 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that savings clause allowed Illinois to enforce law requiring independent medical review of certain denials of medical benefits

  4. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 436 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata

  5. Bi-Economy v. Harleysville

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1418 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 335 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff may seek consequential damages for its breach of contract claim

  6. Universal Am. Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co.

    2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5516 (N.Y. 2015)   Cited 182 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the language of an insurance rider unambiguously applied to losses incurred from unauthorized access to plaintiff's computer system, where the "[t]he intentional word placement of 'fraudulent' before 'entry' and 'change' manifest[ed] the parties' [specific] intent."

  7. Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG Insurance

    100 N.Y.2d 377 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 216 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[r]easonable minds can disagree" as to whether an "absolute pollution exclusion" bars coverage for injuries resulting from exposure to paint or solvent fumes

  8. Underwriters v. City Club

    3 N.Y.3d 592 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 184 times
    Holding an award of attorneys’ fees to the insured is warranted if those fees were incurred "as a direct consequence of [the insurer's] unsuccessful attempt to free itself of its policy obligations"

  9. Pennsylvania General Insurance v. Austin Powder Co.

    68 N.Y.2d 465 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 288 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the argument that the anti-subrogation rule was inapplicable because the additional insured did not itself pay premiums for the coverage because the costs for such premiums were likely priced in to the additional insured's contract with the primary insured

  10. Elrac, Inc. v. Ward

    96 N.Y.2d 58 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 115 times
    Holding that anti-subrogation principles apply to both self-insurers and insurance companies

  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation