55 Cited authorities

  1. Bowen v. Yuckert

    482 U.S. 137 (1987)   Cited 24,379 times
    Holding that "disability claimants" are responsible for making "a threshold showing that their 'medically determinable' impairments are severe enough to satisfy the regulatory standards"
  2. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,042 times   505 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  3. Sullivan v. Zebley

    493 U.S. 521 (1990)   Cited 7,106 times
    Holding that an impairment manifesting only some of criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.

    533 U.S. 218 (2001)   Cited 2,602 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Customs classification ruling "has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron " but can "claim respect according to its persuasiveness"
  5. Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain

    503 U.S. 249 (1992)   Cited 2,709 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1292 applies also to bankruptcy jurisdiction and is not displaced by § 158(d)
  6. Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala

    512 U.S. 504 (1994)   Cited 1,278 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the agency’s interpretation must be given controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation"
  7. Palmore v. United States

    411 U.S. 389 (1973)   Cited 362 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress is not required to vest inferior federal courts “with all the jurisdiction it was authorized to bestow under Art. III”
  8. Regions Hospital v. Shalala

    522 U.S. 448 (1998)   Cited 157 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that regulation was not impermissibly retroactive because it called for the "correct" application of existing reimbursement principles, "not the application of any new reimbursement principles"
  9. County of Los Angeles v. Shalala

    192 F.3d 1005 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 271 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was error for the district court to fashion a remedy for the agency to follow after declaring agency action unlawful
  10. Cobell v. Norton

    240 F.3d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 220 times
    Holding that the Indian canon prevailed over die Chevron doctrine when the two were in conflict
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 330,026 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 423 - Disability insurance benefit payments

    42 U.S.C. § 423   Cited 68,768 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding of disability is prerequisite for eligibility and payment of DIB
  13. Section 706 - Scope of review

    5 U.S.C. § 706   Cited 20,527 times   185 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
  14. Section 1382c - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 1382c   Cited 18,393 times
    Adopting language emphasizing the importance of individual assessments
  15. Section 1383 - Procedure for payment of benefits

    42 U.S.C. § 1383   Cited 15,377 times
    Adopting § 405(g)'s provisions for judicial review of Title XVI claims
  16. Section 1381 - Statement of purpose; authorization of appropriations

    42 U.S.C. § 1381   Cited 8,261 times
    Regarding SSI
  17. Section 1382 - Eligibility for benefits

    42 U.S.C. § 1382   Cited 6,605 times
    Setting forth "the benefit under this subchapter," in dollars, for certain individuals in treatment facilities
  18. Section 1396a - State plans for medical assistance

    42 U.S.C. § 1396a   Cited 3,546 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Concluding paragraph, exception
  19. Section 1381a - Basic entitlement to benefits

    42 U.S.C. § 1381a   Cited 943 times
    Guaranteeing support to eligible “aged, blind, or disabled” people
  20. Section 1395oo - Provider Reimbursement Review Board

    42 U.S.C. § 1395oo   Cited 672 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Granting jurisdiction to the district court over this type of appeal
  21. Section 404.1505 - Basic definition of disability

    20 C.F.R. § 404.1505   Cited 9,011 times
    Defining disability
  22. Section 416.905 - Basic definition of disability for adults

    20 C.F.R. § 416.905   Cited 4,296 times
    Stating that a claimant's disability must be predicated on a "determinable physical or mental impairment"
  23. Section 416.202 - Who may get SSI benefits

    20 C.F.R. § 416.202   Cited 501 times
    Explaining that a claimant remains ineligible for SSI benefits until date he or she files SSI application
  24. Section 416.110 - Purpose of program

    20 C.F.R. § 416.110   Cited 184 times
    Explaining program's purpose
  25. Section 409.61 - General limitations on amount of benefits

    42 C.F.R. § 409.61   Cited 23 times

    (a)Inpatient hospital or inpatient CAH services - (1)Regular benefit days. Up to 90 days are available in each benefit period, subject to the limitations on days for psychiatric hospital services set forth in §§ 409.62 and 409.63 . (i) For the first 60 days (referred to in this subpart as full benefit days), Medicare pays the hospital or CAH for all covered services furnished the beneficiary, except for a deductible which is the beneficiary's responsibility. (Section 409.82 specifies the requirements

  26. Section 406.5 - Basis of eligibility and entitlement

    42 C.F.R. § 406.5   Cited 5 times

    (a)Hospital insurance without premiums. Hospital insurance is available to most individuals without payment of a premium if they: (1) Are age 65 or over, or (2) Have received social security or railroad retirement disability benefits for 25 months; or (3) Have end-stage renal disease. Subpart B of this part explains the requirements such individuals must meet to obtain hospital insurance without premiums. (b)Premium hospital insurance. Many individuals who are age 65 or over, but do not meet the

  27. Section 413.76 - Direct GME payments: Calculation of payments for GME costs

    42 C.F.R. § 413.76   Cited 2 times

    A hospital's Medicare payment for the costs of an approved residency program is calculated as follows: (a)Step one. The hospital's updated per resident amount (as determined under § 413.77 ) is multiplied by the actual number of FTE residents (as determined under § 413.79 ). This result is the aggregate approved amount for the cost reporting period. (b)Step two. The product derived in step one is multiplied by the hospital's Medicare patient load. (c)Step three. For portions of cost reporting periods

  28. Section 416.267 - General

    20 C.F.R. § 416.267   Cited 1 times

    We determine whether the special SSI eligibility status applies to you by verifying that you continue to be blind or have a disabling impairment by applying the rules in subpart I of this part, and by following the rules in this subpart to determine whether you meet the requirements in § 416.265(b) . If you do not meet these requirements we determine that the special eligibility status does not apply. If you meet these requirements, then we apply special rules to determine if you meet the requirements

  29. Section 416.264 - When does the special SSI eligibility status apply

    20 C.F.R. § 416.264   Cited 1 times

    The special SSI eligibility status applies for the purposes of establishing or maintaining your eligibility for Medicaid. For these purposes we continue to consider you to be a blind or disabled individual receiving benefits even though you are in fact no longer receiving regular SSI benefits or special SSI cash benefits. You must meet the eligibility requirements in § 416.265 in order to qualify for the special SSI eligibility status. Special SSI eligibility status also applies for purposes of reacquiring

  30. Section 416.269 - What is done to determine whether your earnings are too low to provide comparable benefits and services you would receive in the absence of those earnings

    20 C.F.R. § 416.269

    (a)What we determine. We must determine whether your earnings are too low to provide you with benefits and services comparable to the benefits and services you would receive if you did not have those earnings (see § 416.265(d) ). (b)How the determination is made. In determining whether your earnings are too low to provide you with benefits and services comparable to the benefits and services you would receive if you did not have those earnings, we compare your anticipated gross earnings (or a combination