135 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,174 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,278 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,777 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"
  4. County of Sacramento v. Lewis

    523 U.S. 833 (1998)   Cited 8,700 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "only a purpose to cause harm unrelated to the legitimate object of arrest will satisfy the element of arbitrary conduct shocking to the conscience, necessary for a due process violation"
  5. Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.

    473 U.S. 432 (1985)   Cited 9,704 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mental disability is not a quasi-suspect class
  6. Washington v. Glucksberg

    521 U.S. 702 (1997)   Cited 2,633 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no fundamental right to physician-assisted suicide
  7. Valley Forge College v. Americans United

    454 U.S. 464 (1982)   Cited 4,970 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the psychological consequence presumably produced by observation of conduct with which one disagrees ... is not an injury sufficient to confer standing under Art. III, even though the disagreement is phrased in constitutional terms"
  8. Davis v. Fed. Election Comm'n

    554 U.S. 724 (2008)   Cited 1,222 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was a reasonable expectation that a congressional candidate would be subject to a federal campaign finance law in the future when he "made a public statement expressing his intent" to run for the seat in the future
  9. Stanley v. Illinois

    405 U.S. 645 (1972)   Cited 5,107 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Illinois could not automatically designate the children of unwed parents as wards of the state upon the death of the mother because fathers of children born out of wedlock have a "cognizable and substantial" "interest in retaining custody of [their] children" under the Constitution
  10. Reno v. Flores

    507 U.S. 292 (1993)   Cited 1,736 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the immigration context, minors aged sixteen or seventeen are not "too young or too ignorant to exercise" their right to make a revocable waiver of a removal or deportation hearing
  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,408 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice
  12. Section 1341 - Taxes by States

    28 U.S.C. § 1341   Cited 1,866 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting federal judicial restraints on the collection of state taxes
  13. Section 666 - Requirement of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement

    42 U.S.C. § 666   Cited 532 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing for interstate garnishment for the enforcement of child support and alimony obligations
  14. Section 31-14-7-1 - Presumptions; child's biological father

    Ind. Code § 31-14-7-1   Cited 34 times

    A man is presumed to be a child's biological father if: (1) the: (A) man and the child's biological mother are or have been married to each other; and (B) child is born during the marriage or not later than three hundred (300) days after the marriage is terminated by death, annulment, or dissolution; (2) the: (A) man and the child's biological mother attempted to marry each other by a marriage solemnized in apparent compliance with the law, even though the marriage: (i) is void under IC 31-11-8-2

  15. Section 29-1-2-7 - Children born out of wedlock; inheritance

    Ind. Code § 29-1-2-7   Cited 33 times
    Providing that "[f]or the purpose of inheritance (on the paternal side) to, through, and from a child born out of wedlock, the child shall be treated as if the child's father were married to the child's mother at the time of the child's birth, if one of the following requirements is met: . . . paternity . . . has been established by law in a cause of action that is filed: during the father's lifetime; or (B) within five months after the father's death"
  16. Section 31-14-10-1 - Hearing to determine support, custody, and parenting time following initial determination of paternity; order to probation officer to prepare report

    Ind. Code § 31-14-10-1   Cited 18 times

    Upon finding that a man is the child's biological father, the court shall, in the initial determination, conduct a hearing to determine the issues of support, custody, and parenting time. Upon the request of any party or on the court's own motion, the court may order a probation officer to prepare a report to assist the court in determining these matters. IC 31-14-10-1 Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-6-6.1-10(a). As added by P.L. 1-1997, SEC.6. Amended by P.L. 68-2005, SEC.15; P.L. 146-2008

  17. Section 31-11-1-1 - Same sex marriages prohibited

    Ind. Code § 31-11-1-1   Cited 17 times

    (a) Only a female may marry a male. Only a male may marry a female. (b) A marriage between persons of the same gender is void in Indiana even if the marriage is lawful in the place where it is solemnized. IC 31-11-1-1 Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-7-1-2. As added by P.L. 1-1997, SEC.3. Amended by P.L. 198-1997, SEC.1.

  18. Section 8-201 - Establishment of parent-child relationship

    Del. Code tit. 13 § 8-201   Cited 13 times
    Explaining "parent-child relationship" and what must be shown to establish one
  19. Section 31-14-6-1 - Blood or genetic testing

    Ind. Code § 31-14-6-1   Cited 9 times

    Upon the motion of any party, the court shall order all of the parties to a paternity action to undergo blood or genetic testing. A qualified expert approved by the court shall perform the tests. IC 31-14-6-1 Pre-1997 Recodification Citation: 31-6-6.1-8(a). As added by P.L. 1-1997, SEC.6.

  20. Section 16-831.01 - Definitions

    D.C. Code § 16-831.01   Cited 7 times
    Defining "[t]hird party" as "a person other than the child's parent or de facto parent"
  21. Section 482.13 - Condition of participation: Patient's rights

    42 C.F.R. § 482.13   Cited 43 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Stating that condition of participation includes patient's right "to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care" and "right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care"