§Why CasetextPricing

BASF AGRO B.V., ARNHEM (NL), WADENSWIL BRANCH et al v. CHEMINOVA, INC.

RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Objection to Motion to Postpone Briefing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

4 Cited authorities

  1. Halpern v. Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    268 F.R.D. 264 (M.D.N.C. 2010)   Cited 30 times
    Finding no good cause to add a new cause of action outside scheduling order deadline where a party realizes "that an existing claim suffers from a legal defect."

  2. Davis v. Trans Union, LLC

    526 F. Supp. 2d 577 (W.D.N.C. 2007)   Cited 15 times
    Finding excusable neglect because the delay resulted from the difficulty of locating defendants rather than oversight or neglect by plaintiff

  3. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,493 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,999 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."