523 U.S. 574 (1998) Cited 4,032 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiff may pursue ordinary discovery into official's intent for claims having intent element notwithstanding irrelevance of intent to qualified immunity defense
Holding that, to state a claim that a public program or service violated Title II of the ADA, a plaintiff must show: he is a "qualified individual with a disability;" he was either excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of a public entity's services, programs, or activities, or was otherwise discriminated against by the public entity; and such exclusion, denial of benefits, or discrimination was by reason of his disability"
Holding factual statements, in which the plaintiff alleged that prison officials “stuck the same needles in everybody's arms”, sufficient to state a claim of a custom or policy causing a constitutional violation
Holding that, in a case regarding the release of prisoners after judicial determinations of innocence, the county's implementation of policies that led to delays in release—and the lack of policies to expedite the process—could support a § 1983 claim
Holding that a dispatcher's mistake about the existence of an arrest warrant was "not sufficient to render an arrest `unreasonable' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment"