9 Cited authorities

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.

    446 U.S. 1 (1980)   Cited 2,082 times
    Holding that it was "proper for the District Judge here to consider such factors as whether the claims under review were separable from the others remaining to be adjudicated and whether the nature of the claims already determined was such that no appellate court would have to decide the same issues more than once even if there were subsequent appeals"
  2. Owen v. City of Independence

    445 U.S. 622 (1980)   Cited 1,936 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that qualified immunity from suit under § 1983 does not extend to municipal defendants or government employees sued in their official capacity
  3. Askins v. Doe

    727 F.3d 248 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 225 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arresting officer’s liability is irrelevant to liability of municipality
  4. Hudson River Sloop Clearwater v. Dept. of Navy

    891 F.2d 414 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 244 times
    Holding that government may not withhold information under FOIA exemption 1 when "the government has officially disclosed the specific information being sought"
  5. Harriscom Svenska AB v. Harris Corp.

    947 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 209 times
    Finding Rule 54(b) certification inappropriate because it was possible, since one of the remaining counts was “closely related to the dismissed contract claims and stems from the same factual allegations, that trial on the [remaining claim] could bring to light facts that would have a bearing on the propriety of summary judgment dismissing the other claims”
  6. Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 v. New York City Transit Authority

    505 F.3d 226 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 34 times
    Concluding that " district court's grant of Rule 54(b) certification does not automatically require . . . review [of] the merits of the appeal"
  7. Fletcher v. Marino

    882 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 24 times
    Finding standing for one plaintiff who elected not to seek re-election due to resign-to-serve law
  8. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 72,489 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  9. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 42,528 times   143 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"