Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a Rule 60(b) motion that basically revisited issues already addressed and rejected
Holding that petitioners were not entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) when they made a "free, calculated, deliberate choic[e]" not to appeal
Finding that denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is "particularly appropriate" when "asserted on virtually identical grounds" as arguments previously rejected by the district court and raised beyond the time for direct appeal