18 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.

    459 F.3d 273 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,189 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an aiding and abetting claim under New York law requires "an allegation that such defendant had actual knowledge of the breach of duty"
  3. Kaufman v. Cohen

    307 A.D.2d 113 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 1,166 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that misrepresentations by one business partner to other partners about the value of a business interest was "essential" to completing the underlying misappropriation of a business opportunity
  4. Global Mins. v. Holme

    35 A.D.3d 93 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 467 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reliance on alleged misrepresentations was unreasonable as a matter of law
  5. Armstrong v. McAlpin

    699 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 469 times
    Holding that appellants' "generalized and conclusory allegations of fraudulent concealment do not satisfy the requirements" of Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
  6. Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & Fass

    754 F.2d 57 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 292 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Observing that "an alleged aider and abettor will be liable only where the plaintiff's injury is a direct or reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct."
  7. Ingle v. Glamore Motor Sales

    73 N.Y.2d 183 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a minority shareholder in a close corporation did not have a fiduciary-rooted exception against at-will discharge where the corporation repurchased his shares pursuant to a repurchase-upon-termination-of-employment clause in a shareholders' agreement
  8. Kolbeck v. LIT America, Inc.

    939 F. Supp. 240 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)   Cited 122 times
    Finding proximate cause lacking where line of causation involved investigation by defendant and subsequent conduct by investigated third party
  9. S K Sales Co. v. Nike, Inc.

    816 F.2d 843 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 138 times
    Holding jury could have calculated plaintiff's profits based on undisputed evidence of full year of sales, and on projection which defendant itself found sufficiently credible to cause it to terminate its agreement with plaintiff and establish its own military sales representative
  10. Vitale v. Steinberg

    307 A.D.2d 107 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 81 times
    In Vitale v. Steinberg, 764 N.Y.S.2d 236 (App.Div. 2003), the court found that an employer-employee profit-sharing plan did not include an agreement to share losses merely by virtue of its paying benefits out over a multi-year period and allowing for the offsetting of benefits in one year by the losses sustained in another year.
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,918 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"