§Why CasetextPricing

Bank of America, N.A. v. Mountain Gate Homeowners' Association et al

MOTION for Summary Judgment

52 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,238 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    511 U.S. 531 (1994)   Cited 1,159 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the neologism "reasonably equivalent value" does not necessarily carry the same meaning as traditional "fair market value"

  3. Carmen v. San Francisco Unified School Dist

    237 F.3d 1026 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 2,848 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court is not required to comb the record for uncited evidence

  4. Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of Agriculture

    18 F.3d 1468 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,673 times
    Upholding agency's conclusion where personal "experiences of [USFS] personnel" were "not the only basis" for it

  5. Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    198 Cal.App.4th 256 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 602 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, while MERS did not have “its own right to assign the note, since it had no interest in the note to assign,” it had the power to assign the note as the lender's “nominee” or “agent”

  6. Shadow Wood Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. N.Y. Cmty. Bancorp, Inc.

    132 Nev. Adv. Op. 5 (Nev. 2016)   Cited 459 times
    Holding that courts retain equitable power to set aside homeowners' association foreclosure sales in quiet title actions under certain circumstances

  7. Dade County School Board v. Radio Station WQBA

    731 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1999)   Cited 562 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment was inappropriate where there was a disputed fact issue as to whether an agreement's express indemnity clause—which provided that the indemnitor would "defend and hold harmless" the indemnitee—was intended to cover the school board's actions or a marching band's actions

  8. Moeller v. Lien

    25 Cal.App.4th 822 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 419 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[t]he comprehensive statutory framework established to govern nonjudicial foreclosure sales is intended to be exhaustive"; declining to "incorporate" provision not set forth in statutory framework's "myriad" rules

  9. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corporation

    112 Nev. 663 (Nev. 1996)   Cited 339 times
    Holding that the district court abused its discretion in applying equitable estoppel because "there [was] no evidence in the record to show that [the party asserting estoppel] was induced to make a detrimental change of position"

  10. Putnam v. Commissioner

    352 U.S. 82 (1956)   Cited 170 times
    Affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court

  11. Section 116.3115 - Assessments for common expenses; funding of adequate reserves; collection of interest on past due assessments; calculation of assessments for particular types of common expenses; notice of meetings regarding assessments for capital improvements

    Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3115   Cited 33 times
    Providing that "assessments must be made at least annually , based on a budget adopted at least annually"