Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 28,570 times 141 Legal AnalysesHolding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
413 U.S. 601 (1973) Cited 3,473 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that Oklahoma may regulate the political activities of its state employees
Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
832 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir. 2016) Cited 870 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding NRS Chapter 116's opt-in notice scheme is facially unconstitutional due to the absence of mandatory notice provisions
Ezell v. City of Chicago
651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011) Cited 542 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that a supplier of firing-range facilities had standing to challenge a Chicago ordinance that burdened its potential customers' firearms training
Kaiser Cement Corp. v. Fischbach Moore, Inc.
793 F.2d 1100 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 1,119 timesStating that a court "must view the evidence and inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment."
Disabled Rights Action v. Las Vegas Events
375 F.3d 861 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 555 timesHolding district court abused its discretion in joining defendant under FRCP 19 when plaintiff could get meaningful relief from the existing parties
Hart v. Massanari
266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001) Cited 476 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that an unpublished "disposition is not written in a way that will be fully intelligible to those unfamiliar with the case, and the rule of law is not announced in a way that makes it suitable for governing future cases"
Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.
693 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 710 timesHolding that the “flow of commerce ends when goods reach their intended destination”
Watson v. Estelle
886 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1989) Cited 85 timesFinding no violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause to apply § 3041.5(b) to prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment prior to the 1977 implementation of California's Determinate Sentence Law
Southwest Offset, Inc. v. Hudco Pub. Co., Inc.
622 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 71 timesHolding that when "Southwest, a Texas corporation, solicited Hudco's business through Southwest's sales representative in Alabama," and when, "[a]fter the initial order was placed with the sales representative, Hudco placed subsequent orders, approximately eight," Hudco "was no mere passive customer of a Texas corporation" in part because "Hudco repeatedly placed orders with the Texas corporation."
Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts
Fed. R. Evid. 201 Cited 29,078 times 26 Legal AnalysesHolding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,753 times 16 Legal AnalysesAllowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system