§Why CasetextPricing

Bank of America et al v. Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 25 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document

43 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 265,756 times   364 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  2. Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo

    544 U.S. 336 (2005)   Cited 3,544 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the securities statutes have a private of action “not to provide investors with broad insurance against market losses, but to protect them against those economic losses that misrepresentations actually cause”

  3. Patane v. Clark

    508 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,574 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discriminatory treatment is actionable "only when it occurs because of an employee's sex, or other protected characteristic"

  4. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road

    70 N.Y.2d 382 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 2,928 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, where plaintiff alleged that defendant failed to exercise "due care" in the design of a railroad project, plaintiff's negligence allegations were "merely a restatement, albeit in slightly different language, of the 'implied' contractual obligations asserted in the cause of action for breach of contract. Moreover, the damages plaintiff allegedly sustained as a consequence of defendant's violation of a 'duty of due care' in designing the project were clearly within contemplation of the written agreement."

  5. N Y Univ v. Continental Ins Co.

    87 N.Y.2d 308 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 1,900 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations Of breach of contract "and any covenants implied" do not sound in fraud

  6. Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.

    459 F.3d 273 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 1,188 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an aiding and abetting claim under New York law requires "an allegation that such defendant had actual knowledge of the breach of duty"

  7. Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.

    987 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 1,914 times
    Holding that district courts may make use of "documents either in plaintiffs' possession or of which plaintiffs had knowledge and relied on in bringing suit" in evaluating Rule 12(b) motions

  8. Shields v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.

    25 F.3d 1124 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,807 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that scienter cannot be "base[d] . . . on speculation and conclusory allegations"

  9. Rothman v. Gregor

    220 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,321 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the date of the filing of the motion to amend constitutes the date the action was commenced for statute of limitations purposes" when "the plaintiff seeks to add a new defendant" (quoting Nw. Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Alberts , 769 F. Supp. 498, 510 (S.D.N.Y.1991) )

  10. Lentell v. Merrill Lynch Co., Inc.

    396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 997 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to prove loss causation, a plaintiff must allege "that the misstatement or omission concealed something from the market that, when disclosed, negatively affected the value of the security"

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 344,855 times   920 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,849 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"