550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 279,746 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that a complaint may be dismissed under Rule 9(b) if it contains "no specific information about the filing of the claims themselves — nothing, that is, to alert the defendants 'to the precise misconduct with which they are charged and to protect defendants against spurious charges of immoral and fraudulent behavior'" (quoting United States ex. rel. Clausen v. Lab. Corp. of Am., Inc., 290 F.3d 1301, 1310 (11th Cir. 2002))
Holding that Price-Anderson preempted state law trespass claim such that plaintiff could "sue under the Price-Anderson Act, as amended, or not at all."
Holding that emotional distress damages are not available in an action for breach of contract unless it can be reasonably said that such damages were contemplated by the parties at the time that the contract was made
Holding that an injunction is only appropriate "to prevent existing or presently threatened injuries. One will not be granted against something merely feared as liable to occur at some indefinite time in the future"
693 F. Supp. 2d 732 (E.D. Mich. 2010) Cited 15 times
In Woodland Harvesting, Inc. v. Georgia Pac. Corp., No. 09-10736, 2010 WL 2813339, at *1 (E.D. Mich. 2010) (Cohn, J.), the Court considered a claim of fraudulent inducement by a woodchip supplier who entered into a long-term supply contract with a particle board plant.