77 Cited authorities

  1. Jones v. R.R. Donnelley Sons Co.

    541 U.S. 369 (2004)   Cited 1,733 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that four-year statute of limitations applies to § 1981 claim "made possible by" the 1991 amendments
  2. Shady Grove Orthopedic v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    559 U.S. 393 (2010)   Cited 1,186 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rules of civil procedure allowing multiple claims to be litigated together "neither change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief nor abridge defendants' rights; they alter only how the claims are processed"
  3. Leocal v. Ashcroft

    543 U.S. 1 (2004)   Cited 1,165 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "DUI causing serious bodily injury" is not a "crime of violence"
  4. Nat'l Assoc. Home v. Defenders of Wildlife

    551 U.S. 644 (2007)   Cited 884 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a stray erroneous statement in the Federal Register "which could have had no effect on the underlying agency action being challenged" is not "the type of error that requires a remand"
  5. Miss. Choctaw Indian Band v. Holyfield

    490 U.S. 30 (1989)   Cited 1,650 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Indian Tribe had exclusive jurisdiction over child custody proceedings, even though the children were born off the reservation, because the children were “domiciled” on the reservation for purposes of the ICWA
  6. Weinberger v. Salfi

    422 U.S. 749 (1975)   Cited 2,777 times
    Holding existence of a final decision made after a hearing is central to the grant of subject matter jurisdiction under § 405(g)
  7. Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs. LLC

    565 U.S. 368 (2012)   Cited 657 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "Congress did not deprive federal courts of federal-question jurisdiction over private TCPA suits"
  8. Califano v. Yamasaki

    442 U.S. 682 (1979)   Cited 2,019 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"
  9. Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.

    562 U.S. 61 (2011)   Cited 522 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court's "interpretation of the Bankruptcy Code starts where all such inquiries must begin: with the language of the statute itself"
  10. United States v. O'Hagan

    521 U.S. 642 (1997)   Cited 497 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Commission, in a nearly identical grant of authority, may regulate acts that are "not themselves fraudulent" if the restriction is "reasonably designed to prevent" fraud or deception
  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 35,573 times   1241 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  12. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
  13. Rule 20 - Permissive Joinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 20   Cited 11,547 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to "issue orders-including an order for separate trials."
  14. Section 227 - Restrictions on use of telephone equipment

    47 U.S.C. § 227   Cited 5,735 times   740 Legal Analyses
    Granting exclusive jurisdiction to federal courts over actions brought by state attorney generals
  15. Section 1658 - Time limitations on the commencement of civil actions arising under Acts of Congress

    28 U.S.C. § 1658   Cited 2,398 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state-law tort period controls § 1983 actions
  16. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  17. Section 2072 - Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe

    28 U.S.C. § 2072   Cited 1,828 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Supreme Court, not the parties, authority to "prescribe general rules of practice and procedure" for federal district court cases
  18. Section 2342 - Jurisdiction of court of appeals

    28 U.S.C. § 2342   Cited 1,075 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts of appeals jurisdiction to review "final orders of the Federal Communications Commission"
  19. Section 0.141 - Functions of the Bureau

    47 C.F.R. § 0.141   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses

    The Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau develops and administers the Commission's consumer and governmental affairs policies and initiatives to enhance the public's understanding of the Commission's work and to facilitate the Agency's relationships with other governmental agencies and organizations. The Bureau is responsible for rulemaking proceedings regarding general consumer education policies and procedures and serves as the primary Commission entity responsible for communicating with the

  20. Section 0.361 - Authority delegated

    47 C.F.R. § 0.361   Cited 3 times

    The Chief, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, is delegated authority to perform all functions of the Bureau, described in § 0.141 , provided that the following matters shall be referred to the Commission en banc for disposition: (a) Notices of proposed rulemaking and of inquiry and final orders in such proceedings. (b) Application for review of actions taken pursuant to delegated authority, except that the Chief of Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau may dismiss any such application that

  21. Section 0.311 - Authority delegated

    47 C.F.R. § 0.311   Cited 3 times
    Stating that "[t]he Chief, Enforcement Bureau, is delegated authority to perform all functions of the Bureau, described in § 0.111," except for certain matters not germane here and "[o]rders concluding an investigation under section 208(b) of the Communications Act and orders addressing petitions for reconsideration of such orders," which "shall be referred to the Commission en banc for disposition"
  22. Section 0.5 - General description of Commission organization and operations

    47 C.F.R. § 0.5   Cited 2 times

    (a)Principal staff units. The Commission is assisted in the performance of its responsibilities by its staff, which is divided into the following principal units: (1) Office of Managing Director. (2) Office of Engineering and Technology. (3) Office of General Counsel. (4) Office of Economics and Analytics. (5) Office of Media Relations. (6) Office of Legislative Affairs. (7) Office of Inspector General. (8) Office of Communications Business Opportunities. (9) Office of Administrative Law Judges.