9 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 17,898 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preliminary injunctions "may only be awarded upon a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief"
  2. University of Texas v. Camenisch

    451 U.S. 390 (1981)   Cited 3,228 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."
  3. Sampson v. Murray

    415 U.S. 61 (1974)   Cited 2,091 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that possibility of backpay obviates risk of irreparable harm
  4. In re DeLorean Motor Co.

    755 F.2d 1223 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 797 times
    Finding that "Rule 52 requires a district court to make specific findings concerning each of these four factors, unless fewer are dispositive of the issue"
  5. Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.

    759 F.2d 1261 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 387 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Shoney's use of the phrase “Big Boy” in the name of its restaurants did not render the phrase confusingly similar to Frisch's own Big Boy restaurants, in part because “[b]y emphasizing ‘Shoney's Big Boy Restaurants,’ as it did in its advertising, Shoney's has identified itself as the source of the services”
  6. Friendship Materials, Inc. v. Michigan Brick

    679 F.2d 100 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 414 times
    Holding that a "district court abuses its discretion when it grants a preliminary injunction without making specific findings of irreparable injury to the party seeking the injunction, and such an injunction must be vacated on appeal"
  7. Ardister v. Mansour

    627 F. Supp. 641 (W.D. Mich. 1986)   Cited 30 times
    Upholding the Secretary's interpretation
  8. Phillips v. Mich. Dept. of Corrections

    731 F. Supp. 792 (W.D. Mich. 1990)   Cited 24 times
    Granting preliminary injunction ordering correctional officials to provide plaintiff with estrogen therapy where plaintiff was a transsexual; crossdressed, lived as a woman, and received estrogen treatment since she was 17; underwent several surgeries and procedures to enhance her feminine appearance; and defendants' failure to provide any medical treatment actually reversed the therapeutic effects of years of healing estrogen treatment
  9. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 23,812 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice