§Why CasetextPricing

Bahmler et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

28 Cited authorities

  1. Daimler AG v. Bauman

    571 U.S. 117 (2014)   Cited 5,611 times   236 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"

  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Oper. v. Brown

    564 U.S. 915 (2011)   Cited 5,197 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction

  3. Walden v. Fiore

    571 U.S. 277 (2014)   Cited 4,293 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the mere fact that [defendant's] conduct affected plaintiffs with connections to the forum State does not suffice to authorize jurisdiction.”

  4. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

    471 U.S. 462 (1985)   Cited 16,817 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

  5. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

    444 U.S. 286 (1980)   Cited 10,825 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

  6. Asahi Metal Indus. Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court

    480 U.S. 102 (1987)   Cited 4,871 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in suit by Taiwanese manufacturer for indemnification against Japanese manufacturer, the assertion by California court of personal jurisdiction over Japanese manufacturer was unreasonable

  7. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 22,575 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )

  8. Hanson v. Denckla

    357 U.S. 235 (1958)   Cited 7,865 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that personal jurisdiction over defendant trustee was inappropriate when defendant's only contacts with the forum resulted from plaintiff-settlor's unilateral activity of moving to Florida

  9. United Tech. Corp. v. Mazer

    556 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2009)   Cited 876 times
    Holding that " court without personal jurisdiction is powerless to take further action"

  10. Sonera Holding B.V. v. Çukurova Holding A.S.

    750 F.3d 221 (2d Cir. 2014)   Cited 244 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a corporation's contacts with New York did not “come close to making it ‘at home' there” even though the corporation solicited business from two New York-based funds, among other contacts that the corporation had with New York

  11. Section 1407 - Multidistrict litigation

    28 U.S.C. § 1407   Cited 7,053 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing consolidation of pretrial proceedings for related cases filed in multiple federal districts

  12. Section 377.60 - Persons who may assert action

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.60   Cited 478 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Creating a "cause of action for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another"

  13. Section 377.30 - [Operative until 1/1/2029] Commencement by personal representation or successor in interest

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 377.30   Cited 386 times
    Granting to the successor the right to sue if no probate has been commenced

  14. Section 71.001 - Definitions

    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 71.001   Cited 90 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Permitting liability for "persons," defined as "an individual, association of individuals, joint-stock company, or corporation or a trustee or receiver of an individual, association of individuals, joint-stock company, or corporation."

  15. Section 78B-3-106 - Death of a person - Suit by heir or personal representative

    Utah Code § 78B-3-106   Cited 18 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (1) Except as provided in Title 34A, Chapter 2, Workers' Compensation Act, when the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another, his heirs, or his personal representatives for the benefit of his heirs, may maintain an action for damages against the person causing the death, or, if the person is employed by another person who is responsible for his conduct, then against the other person. (2) If the adult person has a guardian at the time of his death, only one action may

  16. Rule 52.05 - Who May Join as Plaintiff and Defendant-Protective Orders, When

    Mo. R. Civ. P. 52.05   Cited 3 times

    (a) Permissive Joinder. All persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all of them will arise in the action. All persons may be joined in one action as defendants if there is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative, any right to relief in respect