36 Cited authorities

  1. Hishon v. King Spalding

    467 U.S. 69 (1984)   Cited 12,437 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding Title VII applies to selection for non-employee positions if consideration for that position can be regarded as one of "terms, conditions, or privileges of employment" of a covered job
  2. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

    492 U.S. 229 (1989)   Cited 3,626 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the continuity prong can be met by showing that related predicate offenses continued over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of continuing activity
  3. Dickinson v. Zurko

    527 U.S. 150 (1999)   Cited 955 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the more deferential substantial-evidence standard, and not the "stricter" and less deferential clear-error standard, applies to challenges to Patent and Trademark Office's patent denials, as it does to other agencies
  4. First Nationwide Bank v. Gelt Funding Corp.

    27 F.3d 763 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 658 times
    Holding that allegations of a methodologically unreliable appraisal were not sufficient to establish property values as a fact in a RICO complaint
  5. Texas Trading v. Federal Republic

    647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 280 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the FSIA, personal jurisdiction equals subject matter jurisdiction plus valid service of process
  6. U.S. ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.

    286 F.3d 542 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the False Claims Act “attaches liability ... not to underlying fraudulent activity, but to the claim for payment.”
  7. Joint Stock Society v. UDV North America, Inc.

    266 F.3d 164 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 116 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who had not begun to market their product and were not prepared to do so lacked Article III standing for false advertising claims
  8. World Wide Minerals v. Rep. of Kazakhstan

    296 F.3d 1154 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 112 times
    Holding that contractual waivers are narrowly construed and that RICO claims not related to the contract are not considered to fall within the immunity waiver
  9. Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.

    647 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 188 times
    In Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd., 647 F.2d 200, 209 USPQ 633 (D.C. Cir. 1981), in an action for trademark infringement, two German plaintiffs sought to hale an Australian wine producer, its Australian subsidiary, a New York importer, and a District of Columbia liquor store into the District Court for the District of Columbia.
  10. Starter Corporation v. Converse Inc.

    84 F.3d 592 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 96 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that use of marks was sufficiently "in commerce" to sustain federal-question jurisdiction under Lanham Act
  11. Section 706 - Scope of review

    5 U.S.C. § 706   Cited 20,449 times   184 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
  12. Section 1605 - General exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state

    28 U.S.C. § 1605   Cited 1,899 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the meaning given that term in section 3 of the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991
  13. Section 1330 - Actions against foreign states

    28 U.S.C. § 1330   Cited 1,646 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts with jurisdiction over claims against "foreign state"
  14. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,578 times   260 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"
  15. Section 1603 - Definitions

    28 U.S.C. § 1603   Cited 1,354 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that a "majority" of "shares or other ownership interest" be "owned" by the foreign state or its political subdivision
  16. Section 1057 - Certificates of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1057   Cited 1,020 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a certificate of registration is prima facie evidence of an owner's right to use the mark
  17. Section 1058 - Duration, affidavits and fees

    15 U.S.C. § 1058   Cited 238 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Providing a ten-year duration for registered marks
  18. Section 1126 - International conventions

    15 U.S.C. § 1126   Cited 184 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an application under § 44 "must state the applicant's bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce, but use in commerce shall not be required prior to registration"
  19. Section 6 - Forfeiture of property in transit

    15 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Any property owned under any contract or by any combination, or pursuant to any conspiracy (and being the subject thereof) mentioned in section 1 of this title, and being in the course of transportation from one State to another, or to a foreign country, shall be forfeited to the United States, and may be seized and condemned by like proceedings as those provided by law for the forfeiture, seizure, and condemnation of property imported into the United States contrary to law. 15 U.S.C. § 6 July 2