11 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Field Delivery Serv

    66 N.Y.2d 516 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 356 times
    Stating that agency decision "which neither adheres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious"
  2. In re Yoga Vida NYC, Inc.

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6940 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 39 times   4 Legal Analyses

    10-25-2016 In the Matter of YOGA VIDA NYC, INC., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent. Astrachan Gunst Thomas, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland (Elizabeth A. Harlan, of the Maryland bar, admitted pro hac vice, James B. Astrachan, of the Maryland bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Christopher J. Lyon, of the Maryland bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel) and Lightman Law Firm LLC, New York City (Douglas M. Lightman of counsel), for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Valerie

  3. Bennett v. DiNapoli

    119 A.D.3d 1310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 10 times

    2014-07-31 In the Matter of Dennis C. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, Respondent. Raymond G. Lavallee, Esq., P.C., Farmingdale (Rosanna A. Franzi of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent. PETERS Raymond G. Lavallee, Esq., P.C., Farmingdale (Rosanna A. Franzi of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent. Before:

  4. Lenci v. DiNapoli

    92 A.D.3d 1078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 10 times

    2012-02-9 In the Matter of Marc LENCI, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent. Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, L.L.P., White Plains (Ryan K. Allen of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marlene O. Tuczinski of counsel), for respondent. GARRY Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, L.L.P., White Plains (Ryan K. Allen of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marlene O. Tuczinski of counsel)

  5. Sica v. DiNapoli

    141 A.D.3d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 6 times

    522020 07-07-2016 In the Matter of PAT SICA, Petitioner, v. THOMAS P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, Respondent. Donald P. Henry, White Plains, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent. Garry, J. Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ. Donald P. Henry, White Plains, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent. Garry, J. MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

  6. Fiducia v. Dinapoli

    111 A.D.3d 1018 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    2013-11-7 In the Matter of Leonard FIDUCIA, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, Respondent. Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, LLP, White Plains (Michael J. Catallo of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent. McCARTHY Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, LLP, White Plains (Michael J. Catallo of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent

  7. Hoehn v. N.Y. State Comptroller

    122 A.D.3d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 5 times

    518445 11-06-2014 In the Matter of Robert E. HOEHN Jr., Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER et al., Respondents. Edelstein & Grossman, New York City, (Jonathan I. Edelstein of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen of counsel), for respondents. LAHTINEN, J.P. Edelstein & Grossman, New York City, (Jonathan I. Edelstein of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen of counsel), for respondents. Before:

  8. Meyer v. New York State Comptroller

    92 A.D.3d 1122 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 6 times

    2012-02-16 In the Matter of Michele M. MEYER, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER et al., Respondents. Edelstein & Grossman, New York City (Jonathan I. Edelstein of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents. GARRY Edelstein & Grossman, New York City (Jonathan I. Edelstein of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondents. Before: LAHTINEN,

  9. Sikoryak v. DiNapoli

    104 A.D.3d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    2013-03-21 In the Matter of John J. SIKORYAK, Petitioner, v. Thomas P. DiNAPOLI, as State Comptroller, Respondent. Bartlett, McDonough & Monahan, LLP, White Plains (Patricia D'Alvia of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent. Bartlett, McDonough & Monahan, LLP, White Plains (Patricia D'Alvia of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent. Before:

  10. Matter of Levine v. New York State Liquor Authority

    23 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 51 times

    Reargued December 12, 1968 Decided January 9, 1969 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, EDWARD T. McCAFFREY, J. Robert W. Corcoran for appellant. Benjamin Laskin and Hyman Amsel for respondent. MEMORANDUM. On the original argument of this appeal various documents submitted to the Authority subsequent to its determination were relied upon by petitioner-appellant. The Authority explains that the shortness of time in which the appeal was brought on

  11. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review