§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Collin F. Lloyd-Douglas, Respondent.

Brief

27 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,283 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

  2. Berghuis, Warden v. Thompkins

    560 U.S. 370 (2010)   Cited 2,849 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts can "deny writs of habeas corpus under § 2254 by engaging in de novo review when it is unclear whether AEDPA deference applies"

  3. Colorado v. Connelly

    479 U.S. 157 (1986)   Cited 4,821 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government bears the burden of proving the validity of a Miranda waiver by a preponderance of the evidence

  4. Rhode Island v. Innis

    446 U.S. 291 (1980)   Cited 6,134 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer's subjective intent to obtain incriminatory statements is not relevant to determining whether an interrogation has occurred

  5. Missouri v. Seibert

    542 U.S. 600 (2004)   Cited 1,990 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[s]trategists dedicated to draining the substance out of" constitutional protections cannot accomplish by planning around these protections because it "effectively threatens to thwart [their] purpose"

  6. Dickerson v. United States

    530 U.S. 428 (2000)   Cited 2,289 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”

  7. Moran v. Burbine

    475 U.S. 412 (1986)   Cited 4,088 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to statements a defendant makes to police before he is indicted

  8. Fare v. Michael C.

    442 U.S. 707 (1979)   Cited 1,661 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers' remarks to a sixteen-year-old juvenile that a cooperative attitude would be to his benefit were far from threatening or coercive where he was thoroughly informed of his Miranda rights and the officers' questioning was "restrained and free from the abuses that so concerned the Court in Miranda"

  9. Colorado v. Spring

    479 U.S. 564 (1987)   Cited 1,215 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that suspect need not "know and understand every possible consequence of a waiver"

  10. Florida v. Powell

    559 U.S. 50 (2010)   Cited 390 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that warnings need only reasonably convey to a suspect his Miranda rights